[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

That's my line of thinking, but republican fuckery has no limits.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago

Oh, it's even worse. He's talked about reversing the forgiveness. Not sure how they plan to do that, but we can't trust the law to be on our side once the Republicans start making shit laws. Better hope for a Democratic house, but I'm not holding my breath.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

Seems to me that an election involving a candidate that is inelligble should result in disqualification. The election should have never proceeded with him as a candidate. Can't be overturning an election if the election was invalid to start with.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

That's a legit insult to Forrest Gump. She's a corrupt judge in the pockets of the GOP and needs to be removed.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 61 points 1 month ago

He doesn't understand the nuances of making policy decisions, so his default answer to stuff like this is to just impose tariffs because that's all he knows. He doesn't care to understand and would likely eat the crayons you use if you were to try to explain it to him. He's just incapable of that sort of mental growth.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago

Didn't she just release economic plans recently about stopping price gouging?

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago

Well, in Trumps case, it actually makes sense given the gross mishandling of the pandemic just to try and improve his election chances. These shit headlines are getting old.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 months ago

This is just disturbing. These people need psychological help.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 months ago

I'm torn on this one. Obviously, the victims deserve to get payment and whatnot, but the other half of this is that the bankruptcy court agreement with the Sackler family would prevent them from future liability for similar cases. Supreme Court is saying the bankruptcy court didn't have the power to grant that, which, if excluded, would open the Sacklers to future lawsuits. I'm all for that family getting sued into oblivion, but we can't trust the Supreme Court to do what's right either. We have to treat everything they do with suspicion. This comes on the heels of the ruling of 'bribery is now basically legal', so it makes me wonder how much the Sackler family is paying them.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 months ago

They can't even handle a basic meeting yet continuously think they can handle running the entire country. They would have been fired long ago from any normal job.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Dame la bala, tengo nada sin mi familia. Te veré en hell pájaro.

[-] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

This just reeks of desperation and doesnt sound thought out in the slightest.

1
submitted 1 year ago by Ruorc@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

Ruorc

joined 1 year ago