PhilipTheBucket

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 2 months ago

Sounds like you have your answer

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 2 months ago

It definitely is hilarious to see people legitimately considering backing Adams and Cuomo, both of who are well known to be profoundly corrupt and personally unpleasant people with no real plans to deal with issues that huge portions of the electorate are facing.

I think a lot of the people in a position to decide about this kind of thing are backing Adams (Cuomo is cooked at this point) because he is profoundly corrupt, and has no plans to deal with issues that huge portions of the electorate are facing.

The people who are reading for example the newspapers and podcasts constructed by that first grouping, and then deciding to vote for Adams for example instead of Mandami, are either confused or horrible, in a way that overall is sadly hilarious, yes.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 13 points 2 months ago

Pretty unusual for five people to all vote within half a second of each other

This is actually a consequence of how votes federate out. They go out in batches, all at once, after a little bit of a delay.

I actually do also think that people are artificially trying to rig the votes about particular things (and frequently the admins catch some people doing it with careless obviousness), but this isn’t an indication, it’s more difficult to detect than that.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 45 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Most of the people who died in Germany’s camps weren’t killed “on purpose.” They simply couldn’t survive the conditions, and died of disease, malnutrition, cold, and so on. This is a feature. Explicit killing “on purpose” is just the backup option if things aren’t moving quickly enough.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 2 months ago

Maybe you mean it’s use where people use it specifically as a package manager

Precisely. Containerization is great and Docker does it well. Sending someone a reproducible script that can set up your software package for them is great. Marrying the two concepts unnecessarily and using one specific tool which is designed primarily to do the first, to instead do the second, is the only real issue I’m taking with it.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I honestly just strongly dislike the whole Docker ethos. It was designed for one thing (deployment at scale), at which it excelled, and then everyone uses it for a different thing (reproducible one-off deployment), at which it is fine, basically, but just kind of the minimum set of capabilities to get the job done.

Nix can do what Docker does, in a much superior fashion (lower disk space, much better transparency, rollback ability, lack of towering chains of follow-on effects as you are talking about, and applications outside of mucking around with containerized images), but for some reason everyone uses Docker, and Nix is as far as I can tell unused outside of NixOS.

Whatever. When they make me king, it'll be different, that's all I can say.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 2 months ago

Hm... definitely don't automatically do anything with ponder.cat going forward, this instance is just on the verge of shutting down because the .cat registrar caught me not being Catalan. I'm a little surprised it hasn't already happened.

So what the !communities@ponder.cat bot does is, more or less, just grab https://data.lemmyverse.net/data/community.full.json, sort by (MAU / number of subscribers), and then make a post of the highest-rated community with at least 100 subscribers that hasn't already been posted.

I don't see !nolawns@slrpnk.net in that Lemmyverse list and I have no useful input for you as to why that might be... maybe something to do with Anubis? Is lemmyverse maybe trying to fetch the main page and crawl the .js instead of grabbing the list of communities from the API, something like that, so that it can't update slrpnk anymore now? I have no idea.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 2 months ago

I don't think .ml should be ousted. I think they should stop being dickheads. It's a little tangential to this particular post (mostly only relevant in that it makes people suspicious of their motives when otherwise they would not be.)

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’s crazy how we all have more or less the exact same opinions, and the leader bans anyone who doesn’t have those opinions, and we’re all fine with it and in fact justify it and claim it’s right, whenever it comes up.

It’s totally insane. I have no idea how or why anyone would decide to make an account in our stuff. In fact, it makes other people suspicious of our designated good leader, even in scenarios where there isn’t otherwise a ton of reason to assume any malice.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 0 points 2 months ago

Docker is a mediocre solution to a real problem. It doesn’t cost any money, it does the job, but also, it consumes lots more disk than it needs to and can’t do some things that a solution in this space really should be able to do.

If the world had decided that Nix was the way to containerize their web services and make them reproducible, the world would have been a better place, but that wasn’t what happened (yet at least).

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  • “This isn’t even malicious, just look at it, it’s perfectly innocent”
  • “Besides, if they wanted to do something, they could disguise it way better than this”

Pick a lane, .ml.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I know, we don’t want our software sending our secrets to the trusted good leader, and we don’t feel like participating in places where only the leader’s viewpoint is acceptable. Unlike the non-sheep, who are fine with both those things apparently, because who wouldn’t trust the good leader.

view more: ‹ prev next ›