Numberone

joined 2 years ago
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 1 points 3 days ago

No, but everyone who has been responding have been really positive. Maybe I'll take a swing at it

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah fair enough. I'm not super familiar with the genre, still learning, but I've gotten a ton of good feedback.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 4 days ago

Thanks for explaining it. You and the other comment bpiqued my interest. Grateful.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Interesting. I wouldn't have pictured platformers as having this much exploration. Thanks for taking the time. I'll have to check it out.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 6 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Can anyone explain to someone who doesn't get it? How can a platformer be this great? I'm obviously not a player who gravitates to platformers, but I'm just curious about all this attention.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

"Western values"

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

Haha danke für die geschichte. Menschen sind unglaublich kreativ.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Maimais = Memes. Endlich verstehe ich. Vielen Dank OP❤️

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think that someone is talking about using BTC or ETH. They're literally unusable to make purchases (multiple minute settling times and the high costs you mentioned) but any other functional L1 would work. Algorand for examply has ~3second block times with instant finality and costs a fraction of a fraction of a cent to use the network. Those fees couple be subsidised they're so low. They're significantly lower than a rail like Visa or MasterCard. But you're right, implementing it so anyone can easily use and access it is key.

Edited bad autocorrect

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 14 points 2 months ago

Why men can't be taken seriously you mean? I don't know who this Carla Homolka person is, but if you had a post comparing every woman to their actions on the basis of their sex I'm pretty sure you would get women defending themselves in exactly the same way (assuming this person did something terrible from context).

I'm not sure how you don't see that using "you people" in this way is acceptable in generalizing any other group. There's definitely a pass, socially, when aiming those words at men. Ask yourself why that is.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, and I'm pretty sure both sides have been using them during the war.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/20/politics/ukraine-cluster-munitions/index.html

view more: next ›