MisterFrog

If youre making lots of mistakes, and others are helping you out a lot, then your performance needs to improve.

Is this not a type of performance monitoring? And to be fair, would performance not be monitored in the same way (assuming it's a desk job) not matter if they're working from home or not. I just am usually a bit sceptical that WFH is much of a burden.

This might be a little un-generous, but it seems that you believe the employee is making more mistakes at home, but it could also be your own bias that you know they have a child at home, and you think they're more distracted. I'd encourage you to just look at their work and decide from that if there's actually an issue here (there may well be, I obviously have no idea).

You'll save yourself headaches down the line if you end up putting them on a performance management plan (if it really is a serious issue and not overreacting, again I have no idea), if you base it entirely on performance, and that way there will be no accusations of bias.

If they're getting their work down, I'd encourage you to not worry about it and if they're not, the issue is with them not holding up their end of the bargain - not WFH.

Me personally, I like being in the office, because it's so much easier to bother each other for a quick chat about XYZ issue. When you're at home all you can do is message, since it's hard to tell how focused someone is. At the office you can base it on vibes. I am also single with no kids, so I am strongly in favour of WFH for everyone by default.

My point is, for a small business managing performance is much more challenging with WFH.

I obviously won't tell you how to run your own business, especially since I've never managed a team before, let alone a small business. But I'm still finding it hard to imagine why it's so much harder for a small business (if it's just a desk job).

Anyway, just my 2 cents to encourage you to catch yourself being biased because of children (if you are, you may be right on the money!)

Good to catch with ya :)

Does this not just come out in the wash based on their performance? Like, even if they were say working 6.75 hours instead of the 7.6 standard per day (38 hour standard work week) and were getting their tasks done to a high standard, who cares?

With the time spent not commuting, they're probably hitting their work hours easy.

This is obviously not legal advice, but the angle I'd take if I I were you is if their performance is lacking, just don't even mention the kid at all, it should be squarely focused on performance, that's the only thing that matters to you.

Just my two cents that I think this won't be a big deal in the end, even for employers. Covid has shown us working from home works just fine for most desk jobs.

Disclaimer, I don't have kids, and am an employee of a business where I have to submit timesheets, so these comments are based on my own opinions and not from experience or expertise.

Hopefully this will make a number of people realise how heavily car dependent we are in Australia, not to US-levels, but pretty significantly.

There's no solution to traffic other than viable alternatives to driving.

We need to invest in quality public transport, and in the meantime rapidly expand bus routes (making them less spaghetti-like, and increasing frequencies)

Journalists are the absolute worst at citing their sources. Change my mind.

Really not loving that you're implying that socialism isn't democratic.

In my opinion it's not really socialism if it's not democratic.

May His Noodly Appendage guide us out of these troubling times

Kinda feels like religious discrimination to me...

Certainly not shedding a single tear for the regime, but it remains to be seen how positive this will be for the people Iran long-term.

If I'm not mistaken, the current regime was able to take power in the first place on the back of a movement against the Shah, who US/UK installed via coup.

Who knows what would have ended up happening if the US hadn't meddled in the first place, but the point remains that the US shares a large part of the blame for creating the conditions that brought about the current regime.

Fingers crossed there is a silver lining here :/ Hopefully a genuine grassroots/workers movement can seize this opportunity to bring about something positive.

Sorry, I should have been clearer. People should still pay for the electricity, but at the very least the transmission and most of the generation should be publically owned and provided at cost

And energy retailers like some states have are so dumb. "Shopping around' for electricity when they're just slightly repacking the rate the transmission company sets is so stupid.

Sorry I should have been clearer. I agree the addiction is insidious.

However, making it prohibitively expensive I would argue is part of the reason smoking rates plummeted, as well as no indoor smoking and other smoking restrictions.

I'm only arguing that the illicit trade has been allowed to bloom, and that the black market could be massively curbed with actual enforcement.

And I'm being incredibly sarcastic because there's often someone coming out of the internet woodwork to say that taxing tobacco isn't effective.

That, there are people out there who think smoking is nice, which I think is really dumb, because the high really, really isn't worth the cancer.

I totally get it's very addictive and if you've started, it's very hard to stop, and I sympathize with those people. Only having a go at the people who argue for removing the high taxes, and that smoking is a "personal choice".

All talk about "omgggg you're creating a black marketttt" is nonsense, we're hardly even enforcing anything.

If we properly enforced tobacco restrictions we wouldn't be in this situation.

Sorry, but the high from nicotine is boring as shit and hardly worth the effort.

If it were actually difficult to access illicit nicotine, no one would be doing it.

Case and point: our smoking rate MASSIVELY plummeting before the illicit trade became prevalent.

Nicotine is boring, do a real drug. Wow, you got a little light headed, worth cancer? Change my mind.

Disclaimer: I've had very strong hits of nicotine before.

Capitalism is the reason.

Price stability only exists in a world where we nationalised energy infrastructure.

How will we pay for [edit: constructing] it? Wow, tax. Wow. What a novel idea. Maybe we'll actually get paid for our natural resources. What an idea.