this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
1 points (53.8% liked)
Australia
4338 readers
208 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This reads as you would expect from Newscorp. The way it's written is clearly biased towards a US agenda.
"Targeting our cities" seems like a weird way to put this, seems like emotionally charged language.
At no point does the article actually mention how the Chinese were targeting Australia cities.
Unless they're actually firing something at a city, is it targeting? Intimidating perhaps? Even then, they just passed by.
The deputy PM's response makes way more sense than what this piece seems to be implying.
It then straight up puts forward the American agenda on military spending and the strategic interests of Taiwan. Unlike the Australian side where it just quotes, it straight up takes a position for the Americans.
There's so much actual stuff to be criticising China for, but this passing by isn't one of them.
This shit is manufacturing consent for a future war with the US and China. If the US want to get into a war over Taiwan, that's none of our business. We are a middle power, and have a tiny military. Joining another war for the US would be a huge mistake. Especially against another superpower.
The current government seems on the money on this one, and absolutely fucking stupid when it comes to backing the US strikes again Iran.