[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'm somewhere else but have kept Amazon in the back of my mind as a possible next place, partly out of curiosity to see what it's like from the inside. The culture has some fun elements. No longer. This moves them out of the 2nd tier and into the 3rd, and honestly I'd wonder about anyone there who's not chained to a visa.

4

I bought a used Yamaha A2A and can return it for 30 days.

Do you have any advice to check that it's fine? What have you seen go wrong with these things?

I'm watching a DVD piped through it and it's working. It turns on. The knobs rotate. The remote remotes...?

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

23 and Me says my cousin is my sister...?

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Phones ruined Burning Man. Their cameras make people tourists, and their onsite social media precludes immediacy.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

My company is all in on GitHub Copilot. They have very unrealistic expectations for how much it will increase productivity. I suspect they were sold on data from junior developers, who I think it helps the most. Anyways, now they are measuring how much engineers use it, so there is some amount of pressure to use it more often.

The training was a little worrisome and disingenuous. The internal team advocating for it aren't strong coders and kept showing examples of it automating antipatterns, like writing useless tests that duplicate an if statement in the tested function, writing very verbose and vague comments (meaningless), or taking an example function and making a new one in a boiler plate way (that cut/pastes common code rather than extracting it into a shared function).

Really, I think it's helpful -- sometimes. Especially to new engineers or when dealing with an unfamiliar library. But I do worry it will lower the bar, and feel over using it can be a waste of time.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Utilize. So many people misuse it that I should probably accept that the definition has changed. Instead of thinking they are a bit dumb.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I'll add that even when you're an expert in both languages, it's common to see WTF's in the original and not be sure if something is a bug or just weird behavior that's now expected. Especially when going from a looser to a more strict language.

I've translated huge projects and most of the risk is in "you know the original would do the wrong thing in these x circumstances -- I'm pretty sure that's not on purpose but.... Maybe? Or maybe now someone depends on it being wrong like this?"

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I found HAM folks super welcoming. I came to take the entry level test and they encouraged me to take the next level one at the same time, and generously offered to help me pass it.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

By time required before you can truly be in and accepted as one (not just a tourist)

  • Rural folk
  • Expedition sports
  • Biker gangs
  • Private pilots
  • Some festivals
[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago

The difference is that plant identification is a classification problem, not an LLM.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yes, the posts are absolutely huge and I'm unimpressed with the bot devs response-- dude I am not going to switch Lemmy apps to make your bot less annoying.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I was very happy with Chromecast until last year, when they replaced the screensaver of family photos (from Google Photos) with ads. So I replaced all of the Chromecasts in our house with Apple TVs.

[-] MattMatt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm at a large tech company. We are hiring, and I feel the bar is much higher this year. From my perspective, it feels like a lot of really well qualified people are applying, and that has made the interview panels more picky and slow. I feel that in the past we were very quick to decide and extend offers to people who are likely to do well in the role. But that urgency feels gone, and there's a larger pool of candidates, so the panel is much more likely to pass or ask the candidate to wait while they interview more people.

view more: next ›

MattMatt

joined 1 year ago