Welllll,
I don't see it reported much anywhere.
Maybe they're keeping it mum and Times is just sort-of appealing to their base with obscure info.
Okay, I'm interested in finding this info.
lol Also, thanks, Washington Times (Moony Times) for letting us know!
Oh the horror... /s
I think the aims of putting Obama on trial are stupid and even counter-productive to actual justice and will just enhance Trump's power.
That being said...
It could actually make the Democrats fight and certain sectors of the Republicans infight instead of just kowtowing to Trump all day.
On another note, Obama should be tried primarily for war crimes, but that's not what this is about.
I... actually doubt it.
While I agree about the Democrats being in denial, this would probably cause a real split.
Sorry for the angry outburst on my part, but this thing has really misled people.
NO
They said that after the fact, after they that they "hacked" the election machines, or "hacked" something.
It was vague enough to be misleading, to some degree, but they were acting like it was actual infrastructure; the whole media ran with it.
"Influencing" an election isn't a crime in this day and age.
I think that Jack Dorsey shouldn't be trusted with meshtastic technology.
Frankly, though, the ensuing trial will be a show trial.
That's a very good point, and I trust your experience as well. Yeah, any Western journo can find a case study somewhere.
Really? I've heard most startups are kinda corrupt, especially when they involve private equity
view more: next ›
Yeah, same, but to be fair, even I could be wrong; it was so long ago.