LaserRunRaccoon

Thank you for your wisdom, Lord Farquaad.

The problem is realism. Sim City would teach you that a village of 150 people will absolutely grow into a thriving city because that's the simple premise of the game - it's a citybuilder - but that's not how real life works. They could play increasingly more complex simulation games like Democracy 3, and it would still fail to be a realistic look at the complexities of modern society.

I'd also argue the opposite lesson is usually learned from games, because most gamers don't play on "hardcore" mode - and those that do play hardcore can still always reroll or /ff to start another game or even just touch grass and stop playing the game. Playing God doesn't reinforce empathy.

Good policy needs to balance a clinical approach against empathetic concerns. My advice to policy makers would be reading books like "Cities and the Wealth of Nations" by Jane Jacobs and learning from modern experts and non-profit advocates like Strong Towns. They should be looking to peers for success stories to emulate and for failures to avoid.

Are ride-hail drivers better off when cars become astronomically more expensive and rare, and are cashiers better off when stores are closing?

Revolution is for those who think they have nothing to lose - or think that they cannot lose. Someone with a "bad" job is ironically still much further from supporting widespread upheaval than a mansion-dweller who thinks they're untouchable.

It's still dangerous if no one dies.

Here's one from today: https://www.cp24.com/news/2025/04/07/3-injured-one-seriously-in-11-vehicle-collision-in-etobicoke/

https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/local/article/please-drive-with-extra-caution-says-councillor-after-15-year-old-girl-fatally-struck-in-north-scarborough/

Calling a kid's death an "appeal to emotion" when it's a real tragedy from a couple weeks ago - and blaming it on me because I'm actually aware that deaths like this happen every week? You're a sad person.

Sometimes it's "just" a dead girl hit by a speeding SUV a couple blocks away from their school. Even something as simple as a bit of extra speed has a remarkable influence on life or death. Both in avoiding and mitigating harm.

Not as exciting as Max Max, but nice movie reference.

I only drive safely on the days I choose to drive - and yet, I somehow still always see unsafe driving every day.

Just a fairly normal North American city, actually. So yeah - thunderdome.

Much appreciated, I'll check out both!

If you can't conceive of a situation where you need to slam the brakes due to external factors despite following the recommended 2-second following distance, you're ignorant of the depths of bad driving. Have you really never been cut off before?

I would go so far as to say that if you're not noticing at least a single example of dangerous driving nearly every time you leave the house, you're probably not aware enough to be a safe driver.

Broken glass, fire, impalement, road rash, and being thrown around like a rag doll... thinking highway death isn't violent is just a very fortunate lacking in imagination.

Being a pedestrian in proximity to a driver might be riskier, unfortunately. Most driving safety standards - including vehicle and infrastructure standards too - do not adequately protect people outside of vehicles.