Kyokha

joined 3 weeks ago
2
No way such events exist! (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 22 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago) by Kyokha@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
 

(https://archive.is/20180113014530/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/comrade-meet-cupid--young-communists-play-matchmaker-for-chinas-millennials/2018/01/11/3da12de4-f2c4-11e7-90ed-77167c6861f2_story.html#selection-1275.0-1350.0)

To nurture that closeness, the Zhejiang branch built "a public-interest dating platform," Qin Qing Lian, that is part "swipe right," part "socialism with Chinese characteristics."

Men are advised to become providers, women to find a provider, fast. "As long as he's willing to spend money on the woman he loves, he's the right one to marry," one tip says.

He spent the day trying out lines: "Why won't you look me in the eyes?" he asked one young woman. "Is it because I'm too handsome?"

Cai, the crooner, did not dispute that women are under more pressure. "Men don't age as quickly as women," he said, as if it were a scientific fact.

xi

[–] Kyokha@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

There are many points in the article that one can criticize, especially the implementation part prompting the author to describe degrowth as viable option (which I consider a social democrat capitalism-lite way of solving the problem)

But overall, it's a good and accurate critique of capitalism's symptoms on individuals and society as a whole.

2
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by Kyokha@hexbear.net to c/psychology@lemmy.ml
16
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by Kyokha@hexbear.net to c/marxism@hexbear.net
[–] Kyokha@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Congratulation comrade, that's great news!

Hopefully you will dismantle your other conditions (and maybe the bourgeoisie kingdom as a bonus)

[–] Kyokha@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a physician I would definitely recommend to go see a doctor if you sense that something is wrong. You never know if its just a passing thing or an alarming symptom needing urgent care unless maybe you have a medical degree but even then its still recommended since you aren't a specialist in everything.

You should also realize that those doctors are also humans and probably burned out from overwork so don't be so hard on them

[–] Kyokha@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you very much for the warm welcome!

I will defiantly join in.

Thank you for the physics insight. I too don’t find the mechanical deterministic view compelling, but really it was partly due to my laziness that I judged the users name of Marxism Leninism and assumed he was level headed. Even if we were fully determined, it will eventually lead to fatalism which hinders our socialist cause as the other commentator has mentioned.

Sorry for broad questions but how do you apply this Marxian worldview in your personal/organizational life if you don’t mind intruding? Are there things you take for granted or you constantly criticize your own beliefs?

[–] Kyokha@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Thank you comrade for the great explanation!

This book below is a great supplement to this topic and the whole Popperian criticism https://archive.org/details/CornforthOpenPhil/page/n21/mode/2up

 

New member but long time lurker here and lemmygrad, it might not be a good starter post for my social credit to make such a theoretical posts but nevertheless this article is a great criticism of our method of viewing the world and basing our practice on it.

I myself admit of ideating towards idealism and thinking that diamat explained everything in the world and that the revolution IS inevitable and that there is no need to struggle anymore because it was all going to workout in the end...

I started applying the process of "negation" and "sublation" to my own life and decisions (history as an automatic upward spiral, etc.) which as you might guess lead me to nowhere, but once I realized the mistakes I had made and started epistemic overcorrection and refuted dialectical materialism(for a short while).

I would love for this to be discussed widely...