[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

How do you know it's just a bookshelf?

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA Trump knowing how to play checkers hahahahaha

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

If you're trolling, you're doing a great job.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you for reducing your meat consumption. I know you can go all the way with it.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Lots of people in fuck cars communities are black and white about it. They're very unwilling to even discuss compromise. They'll say the city needs to build a subway system under all the farmland.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The person who wrote this blog has no brain wrinkles.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

In this particular case the defendant had a history of using 👍to accept a contract. Had done it NP a dozen times before

The article doesn’t say that. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he used text message before to accept a contract. It doesn’t say that he had ever responded to a contract with a thumbs up emoji before.

“Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order.”

No mention of thumbs up emoji having been used prior to this particular thumbs up emoji incident.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

NO! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT! (WARIO STYLE "MMEEEEEEEHHHHHH") (runs away).

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

and the same people complaining about the same people constantly complaining about reposts that most of the community haven’t seen 🙄

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, I read it. Did you? It said:

"Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order."

It does not say that the argument was made that he previously agreed to a contract through text message _ by sending a single 👍_.

This is the context we have through the article, and so no, a single emoji as a binding contract is ridiculous.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

There's always this guy who's like, aCtchUaLLy....

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It is completely absurd to rule an emoji as an agreement to a contract.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Hypnoctopus

joined 1 year ago