Hugohase

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Are they talking about something like this

Or something like this

The first one has been forbitten in my country for ~10years and nobody seems to miss them. The second one is used, rarely, for takeout and mostly replaced with paper bags.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will take some time but I will answer with sources. Can you post the source used in the map i have never been able to find anything that came close.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This map underrepresents emissions from NPPs. The emissions that are assumed for nuclear are lower than everything you find in literature and are 1/5th to 1/10th of what reputable sources state. That being said, this map is otherwise a great resource and i like it very much.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I don't agree with you but either way that doesn't change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 28 points 1 year ago (10 children)

There are just better/faster options...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe you can get something out of here

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I always use a factor of 1200 as approximation e.g. 1GW produses 1.2 TWh per year but thats very very rough.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

If this is ever deemed feasible the world will already run on renewables. There might have been a time for NPPs but 2024 ain't it.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!!!!1

Wir wissen alle was ihr macht...

view more: ‹ prev next ›