In a now-deleted post, a Reddit user last week alleged that their photos…

A recently deceased Boeing employee alleged that the quality control process…

There’s a Luxembourgish backup so all is under control.

So pro Russia hacktivists are running Microsoft for the last ~7 years you say?

https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/17/microsoft-lost-keys-government-hacked/

Oh, so they are going to rename Entra again!

Exactly zero people studied history in this channel. It explains a lot.

Satoshi Nakamoto confirmed!! Wohooo! John was hiding it so well :)

That’s the envelope method

I agree with you on the need for a balanced approach, recognizing both the utility and potential issues with cash. Checks and balances in financial systems are vital.

Thank you for a thoughtful and engaging conversation on this complex matter. Your insights have certainly added depth to my understanding. Let's continue to advocate for responsible and balanced policies.

I agree that makes sense and is highly needed, but I always remember the civilization-old question “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (“Who will guard the guards themselves?” or “Who watches the watchmen?”). Balancing privacy with oversight is complex. Cash offers an option for privacy and autonomy. Striking a balance between individual rights and societal needs requires thoughtful governance, not necessarily the elimination of choices like cash that some citizens may rely on.

Cashless society is a controlled society. While some may misuse cash for illicit activities, many prefer it to protect privacy, maintain personal control, or avoid digital vulnerabilities. Dismissing cash usage solely for nefarious reasons overlooks legitimate concerns and individual freedoms, and equates privacy with wrongdoing, a perspective that might inadvertently erode fundamental rights and personal autonomy.

A million dollar (drachma ?) question right here