[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Apart from screaming case, which is for textual macros, i approve.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Computer science is a branch of math. And while it has applications in software, most developers do not interact with it, only using existing implementations of CS results.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

It is black sea fleet

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Move the wheel under the thumb. Until then it's anything but ergonomic.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Exactly. If you are a coder and care about ergonomics of layouts, get split programmable keyboard, do not try to find good layout for normal keyboard, they do not exist. I personally do not like the particular keyboard at the picture, but there are many others to choose from and find a good fit for everyone.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

They also have an audacity to call these 6 inchers "compact".

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I don't think you understand how percentage works.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Proofs can be represented as programs, not the other way around. Also, USA allows for algorithm parents, and algorithms are maths. While I agree with you, your reasoning is not correct.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Ai generates texts with accordance to material it learned from. So it will be PC gamer, IGN and Kotaku combined.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It has nothing to do with clang being command line. It consists of many binaries, all of them untrusted. Any time new dynamic lib is loaded Mac stops the process and complains. Then you need to do manual stuff, as you can't automatically trust a binary, for obvious reasons. This happened almost two years ago, maybe clang got apple certificates or some shit to combat the issue. But my point was that every OS update on Mac brings annoying issues for developers.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I agree with your sentiment about users sometimes are disingenuous with their fanboyism. But trying to pretend article is saying rust is terrible for refactoring is not a fair argument either. Some library grade code may require more attention, yes. But in most cases it means you would need to do many changes in other languages too, but you'll discover it in production.

[-] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

For those saying it's like satisfactory. Actually, it draws much inspiration from fortress craft evolved. At least game mechanics wise. But foundry seems to be much more polished, plus they add their own twists to the formula. I wouldn't dismiss it just based on the looks.

view more: next ›

GeniusIsme

joined 10 months ago