DragonSidedD

I've been in Signal chats with Tulsi Gabbard's staff.

And no ofc it's not that impressive. They used the app during the Dem Primary campaign trail so all the campaign volunteers used it to coordinate.

Back then I thought she would be a charismatic Dem that could win against Trump -- when none of the Dems (esp. not Biden IMO) seemed to have a chance.

Back then she was inclusive with her political rhetoric. She was the only candidate on either side whose primary message was:

Respect the other side as people, and try to understand their point of view

OMFG I wish I'd hear that from politicians more often. Or ever.

Please forgive me. I was like 9 years younger back then and Tulsi hadn't gone MAGA.

I like how they cut Texas off at the 'nards

Spectating can be fun but the real enjoyment comes from being an active player

Trump

Fun fact: most hetero men (like myself) LOVE BOOBS

We love ALL BOOBIES

We especially love BOOBIES WE CAN (almost) SEE

You have a nice body and sweet cute tits. Hide them if you wish, but flaunt them if you want power over us.

The only crypto worthy of the name

I approve, and wish to add my support

Windows

Tea

Umbrellas

An easy peertube + Ghost spin for content providers could probably be a viable business model

"Atheists" who make themselves, or the State, a swap-in replacement for God(s) are not much different from purely religious authorities who abuse their positions. It is apparently a common kind of power-seeking Dark Trait.

The Leviathan theory of the state -- the Motherland who is greater than us, who we would die for as cells die to preserve the body, and whose Exegeses come from the Great Leader/Supreme Council/President for Life.

It's exactly the same play on faith and credulity and servility that religions use.

Bingo.

I have way more respect for ravers at Burning Man who OD on Ecstasy while dancing naked and copulating for 14 hours straight.

At least they enjoyed their completely unproductive dalliance

Atheists don't need to disprove theists any more than they need to disprove Leprechauns. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive assertion.