[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Negative Income Tax as proposed by Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman is a much much much better implementation than a straight up UBI.

Link

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

But Brawndo got what plants crave, it's got electrolytes!

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

If there was a true civil war the military would probably be divided with some on one side and some on the other but I really doubt there will be a civil war any time in the near future.

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Dolph Lundgren is going to star in a movie with that exact premise!

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Klatu, Verata.... Ni-humlenhdkidpwkehehkamajhen

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Brawndo@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

And how did that work out for the estimated 15-55 million people that died of starvation as a result of the "equitable distribution of land ownership"?

Source

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social -3 points 11 months ago

Social Security is one of the greatest scams of all time.

Generally speaking, this is how it works

Lower Income families pay into it longer (didn't go to college, have to get a job and start getting taxed at 18 vs. going to college and started to be taxed at say 22)

Lower Income families receive benefits for less time (pretty much all statistics show that the wealthier you are, the longer you live)

Lower income families pay a higher percentage of their income than wealthier families. (Social Security only on the first ~$130K in income. It's a regressive tax)

Lower income families are paid out less in benefits. You get paid out based on what you pay in.

Wealthier families typically have other passive forms of income that are not subject to the Social Security tax, this means that if they get to keep this income stream going into retirement they are at a massive advantage over lower income families who if they have to work a job in retirement that again have to pay Social Security taxes on wages they earn.

In addition to all of this, upon death of both the primary and spouse, all the money taken vanishes and cannot be passed down to their children or beneficiaries which only compounds wealth inequality.

In short, Social Security is a regressive tax that unfairly penalizes the poor and provides a higher welfare pay out to families that are wealthier.

[-] Brawndo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›

Brawndo

joined 1 year ago