[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

The gallery still has to be closed, has to dedicate cleaners, invest into security measures etc. Vandalism can be as simple as spitting on the street. But that's not my point, in general.

My point is why mess with a place what has nothing to do with climate change, and not mess with places that absolutely do have something to do with it?

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Why do you assume it's less shock value? I would argue the opposite

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Well I agree with the problem, but I don't believe attacking art galleries is a solut. Why not spray paint a real estate firm?

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You created your own argument here though, right? I can be an advocate for any of one million serious problems that our societies have. Should everyone go destroy art galleries? Housing crisis = art destruction? Unliveable minimal wage = art destruction? Car centric societies = art destruction? Local store increased prices = art destruction? You have to agree that at a certain point this becomes indistinguishable from vandalism.

At what level then is this threshold? Or do you propose a hierarchy of ideas, which are suitable to protest in an art gallery, versus those that aren't?

167
submitted 5 months ago by Barsukis@lemmy.ml to c/aww@lemmy.world
[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 25 points 8 months ago

Yep. I used to share my account with my family before Netflix's password sharing crackdown. When they did it, I deleted my account day 1.

My dad and my sister just resubscribed separately. Unfortunately, a net win for them. Efectively +1 user. Just one example, but I'm betting this worked for many more of their users.

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 27 points 9 months ago

Bro has never visited Lithuania or Poland. The countries are amazing and probably more advanced in many regards than 90% of US shithole states

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

To all people asking for source and saying bullshit : it takes 1 second to find results on Google showing that it's in factnot bullshit

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-column-great-debate-idUKBRE97S0KU20130829

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I hope this is true, but it's not the first time someone claims this

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Now check up how much water is required for meat, and suddenly realise that you're maybe fighting the wrong battle here mate.

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I wonder how is this measured, because I think by now we all have been exposed to COVID, one way or another. Sometimes without knowing. What they could be looking is simply people with a weaker immune system vs stronger immune system/ less preconditions vs more preconditions. I didn't have time to analyse the article/paper right now but with a quick read I don't think I noticed explanation how they control against that.

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Imagine disliking a meme and somehow bringing in politics into this. Go touch grass lol

[-] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Just buy a Fairphone end enjoy the exact same thing

0
submitted 1 year ago by Barsukis@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

Barsukis

joined 1 year ago