AppaYipYip

joined 2 years ago
[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Omg we are such opposites. I grew up in FL and 60sF (15C) is winter for us. Like people will straight up wear jackets in the 60s. I love weather in the 80sF (26C), 90sF (32C) is bearable, but 100sF (37C) is horrible and stay inside as much as possible.

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I 100% know people who never discussed their religion/culture before starting to date and then refused to address their obvious religious/cultural differences for way to long. I live in a major city in the US so we have tons of people from all sorts of backgrounds. Some people I know don't want to bring up their religious/cultural beliefs until they know the person a bit better but by then they are in deep and don't want to leave despite the glaring differences.

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I seriously thought about this and in my opinion, no. With it upside down, the head opening would be right at your privates making them more like pantalettes (old timey open-crotch underware).

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree completely because it's super confusing for most women to find the right bra. Which then leads to women wearing the wrong size and feeling uncomfortable.

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Breast size has no affect on breast feeding. Any sources to back up your claim?

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This graph is useless because cup size ≠ breast size. Cup and band sizes go together to fit the person. A 34D is way smaller than a 40D even though they are the same cup size. Without the band size we have no idea what the real difference is. This video explains it pretty well: https://youtu.be/L9JZzPMHok8

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Omg thank you for this!!! I never understood when whom would ever be used!!

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I know!! I can't imagine Zuko with any other voice!!

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

So I think the "horse is likely to bite you if you’re looking in its mouth too closely" is an assumption we both had about this phrase. I grew up in the suburbs and rarely saw horses so I assumed this phrase was about it possibly bitting. However I now live in a more rural area and horses are pretty sweet and the only reason anyone looks in their mouth is to make sure they're healthy or figure their age. I'm guessing you, like me, also grew up not around horses so we assumed the English version means something different than it probably did in the past when horses were common place.

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are rumors the original creators are making a new animated show about the next avatar in the cycle who is an earth bender. More info is supposed to be released this year!

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

So not trying to argue, just have a genuine conversation. Talking from an American perspective, British implies the British Isles (place) to me and not the people (who I honestly have no idea when they lived or currently live there??). I'm not familiar with any other name for the isles (again speaking as an American).

Also, I think (or hope) that most people would understand and any research into the Iron Age is only showing a survival bias that may not indicate the whole population in an area. However, I think it's fair to state that if you see a trend across multiple sites in roughly the same time period, it indicates a larger cultural practice in that area because we are only seeing a small amount of surving evidence. For this reason, I think "some" is too broad.

[–] AppaYipYip@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It shouldn't say "Some", it should say "British" because if you read the article this seems to be a trend across British iron age communities.

 
 

My friend made me custom oreos with Xiao on them.

view more: next ›