Just tought it looked cool. Stolen from reddit. Originally by /u/eizuru.
Either you're on social media, or you don't exist 🤔
While we might not agree with immigration policy and power abuse, it's hard to put moral limitations on who gets to use our software. While the example you gave is far from trivial.
The second we say someone can't use our software for whatever reason, that's the second the software is no longer truly free. It's same with Open data.
If you set in writing that your software can be used by anyone, then you also take away the power of those in high places to interpret the licence in a discriminatory way.
That may be true, but there is (usually) also an upside. Any fixes and modifications must be shared back. Thank you copyleft licenses. Thank you GPL.
How do you connect i/o devices to it?
Whoa, uncanny. This gives me some real "Ljubljana vibes". It's probbably someplace in Austria tho, right? Going by the flag.
To me it feels texting takes longer. Call someone up and it's done in less than a minute. Why write some long ass message?
Most folks don't even bother writing back... Message seen? Best forget about it.
Edit: typo
That's quite an emoji you got there 🍆
Uh, is there a kind soul that has a link to a mirror of any of the mentioned youtube videos that were taken down? I'd realy like to see what it looked like - talking to random NPCs on the streets ov GTA V.
GIS (Short for Geographic Information Systems)
While I agree with you completely, the argument for a counter-point would be that exactly because the private company should create as much profit for the owners as possible - it has to be as lean / efficient as possible.
That is not true for "the goverment" as profit is not an encentive to rationalize the work process.
What I find interesting are goverment agencies that operate on both levels. A great example is Ordenance Survey in UK. While they provide a public service, they also sell some of their products commercially to cover some operating costs (hiking maps etc.).