AlteredStateBlob

joined 2 years ago
[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do note that is not for the foundation which runs and develops Firefox, but for the company. Still shit, but separate from the browser.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There already is federation of deletion. It's not even something that needs to be implemented.

I have less of a defeatist attitude about privacy. Same way I don't think absitence is the only true way of contraconception. Privacy, yes, even if public spaces is possible. It's not easy, it won't just happen, but it is achievable. Needs a lot of work from a lot of people, but it is doable.

I don't expect you to change your mind on that.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yes, and my point is, that the person running an instance has to comply with the gdpr if they are within the EU.

It doesn't matter if data has already been propagated somewhere else. On that instance, data needs to be able to be fully deleted. For the matter of deletion, it is irrelevant where the data might have been pushed or mirrrored to, that is a seperate issue, which still needs to be dealt with. But one cannot argue that deleting is pointless or needn't be implemented, just because "public" data is already mirrored elsewhere. The people running "elsewhere" have their own compliance to deal with.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Reddit still has to ensure what is deleted on their end, is actually deleted (which they don't, as we saw during the whole protest thing with delted comments being restored)

The fact that archive websites exist doesn't change that. A request under gdpr to such a site would have to result in deletion as well.

Sure someone who doesn't host or specifically target EU citizens can ignore it at their leisure, but I doubt every Lemmy instance is hosted somewhere in non EU areas.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You are slightly wrong. The GDPR applies to everyone dealing with personal data on the regular, which you always have to assume with open text boxes. There have been plenty rulings already imposing fines on individual, private citizens for their misconduct in violation of the gdpr.

While Lemmy as a system might be exempt, anyone running Lemmy for sure isn't, as long as it regularly processes data of EU citizens, which it does.

As for the devs, the gdpr does require privacy by design. One could argue the Devs themselves aren't running it at all, so their software doesn't have to adhere to it, but individual instance hosts could still be hit with fines for running it as is.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Steam didn't invest in marketing nonsense and gimmicks to get people on their platform. For consumers it is simply the superior product, DRM not withstanding.

They got their issues, no doubt. But I have never seen a quasi monopoly be more consumer oriented than steam.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You could try pinning tabs you want to keep before restarting. I do the same if I really want to be sure. Pinned tabs generally survive restarts, even during updates.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

He would be. Seems to me, he'd be a happy little integrated lapdog like Belarus.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Ah yes. Blame the victim. They're all fools and idiots. Definitely not the comically evil corpo scheme that's the issue here. No, users need a good robbing and thrashing online for being dullards and believing that when they get a purchase confirmation, that they purchased the thing.

Get out of your bubble sometimes, maybe.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, it is about control. Companies like meta with near infinite resources made their money by exploiting the ever living fuck out of data the vast majority of people to this day do not understand to have any value at all despite the evidence of not just one but multiple trillion dollar companies existing soley due to the exploitation of this kind of data.

I am done with being sold to, having my data harvested, being gaslit, being spied on, seeing these companies avoid the shit out of any consequences for their actions, etc.

Ooh, but it is open, if they wanted to scrape the data they just could! Yes, and it would be fucking illegal under frameworks like the Gdpr. If they join the system though? Wells then they have a legal basis again yo just keep tracking you. Not only that, they avoid further sanctioning by being able up show that they work on interoperability, without investing anything at all, simply by exploiting Foss software.

Ooh, but individuals can block instances, no need to defederate on an instance level! Sure and most people won't know about it or how to do it or just not care enough and get to enjoy being abused by these companies yet again in a space specifically chosen for not being that.

Oh, I don't see a way they could possibly exploit this or extinguish it! Cool. I bet their lawyers, psychologists, experts in every field imagineable that has anything to do with using data and driving engagement are exactly as stumped about it as a random user out here. Bet they couldn't possibly have a plan because we don't see one.

Anyone who has even an ounce of trust that meta and all these other exploiters will not find a way to ruin activitypub, has not paid attention in the last 20 years of internet service development.

Activitypub as a technology will survive this. The fediverse as an alternative to these utter monsters of companies might very well not.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 80 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Netflix and Amazon prime simply won't work with VPNs active, which I use for work and privacy towards my ISP.

I won't compromise my security for their bad services. Living in a non US country, we are also always several years behind on content being offered.

Yeah, nah. The paying customer always pays for the percieved sins of non customers.

Set sail.

view more: ‹ prev next ›