A_norny_mousse

joined 1 day ago
[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 2 points 23 minutes ago

Where else? It's the most disrespectfully political carnival parade in Germany afaik.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago

It's something courts deal with all the time.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 35 points 13 hours ago (3 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 16 points 13 hours ago

Interesting.

Did you read their website/faq? It very clearly tells me that Betterbird has a very different focus than LibreWolf. It's not about Privacy, it's about fixing bugs.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago

as much as 72 per cent of the country backs the protests.

Wow.

The demonstrations are changing Serbia’s image as a Russian ally in the Balkans. The students organise themselves in a form of direct democracy, making daily decisions and votes without fixed leaders. Their demands are in line with EU values.


But the protesters do not trust president Vucic.

I'm woefully underinformed on Balkan issues in general and Serbia in particular, but that much I agree with.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why is the article so uncritical? It just takes a quick wikipedia run to see how ludicrous this is:

Fusion power is a proposed form of power generation that would generate electricity by using heat from nuclear fusion reactions.

By 2030 they have that up and running? 🤣

And "new-generation fission" is just a wishy-washy cover-your-ass term. Could mean anything. Wikipedia brings up a couple of pages that are again full of terms like "proposed", "suggested", "might".

And then there's this:

The Italian Council of Ministers approved a plan on Friday to revive nuclear power, reversing the anti-nuclear stance solidified by referendums in 1987 and 2011.


I basically agree with the idea of reaching energy independence and carbon neutrality fast but this does not seem to be the way; the cynicism expressed in other comments is more realistic.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 91 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

legally defining political deception, and strengthening existing rules to explicitly ban misleading statements.

I'm all for this. No, it won't be perfect. Yes, it will sometimes be abused (e.g. against opponents). But this needs to be enshrined in law: politicians must be held to a higher set of moral standards while in office. Sometimes it feels like reality is the exact opposite: every job requires this, except politics.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Writing this as code doesn't work very well in my browser, long lines aren't broken.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

And the update on his new look: pale around the eyes in a sea of orange

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The issue is also the disconnect from reality: achieving such an ideal would require policy that is diametrically opposite to what they're pushing for.

(apart from the inherent sexism and racism)

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Except every app depends on Node.js

view more: next ›