this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
150 points (88.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

9085 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] codapine@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Objects in motion tend to stay in motion.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 77 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Air resistance is an outside force though. And pretty significant at road speeds.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Every time this gets posted you get at least a couple of people pushing up their glasses and refuting it like they've never ridden a bike or stuck their hand out of a car window

[–] codapine@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Fair point. This was the first thing I looked at when I woke up today before putting my brain in gear, and I was thinking of the example of being in a train carriage at 70mph and jumping up - because the air resistance is acting upon the train, not directly upon the passenger jumping up and down, they don't end up having the back of the train catch up to them at 70mph...

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yes but if he jumps the same direction as the vehocle is going, depending on the angle he jumps at, the surface area he presents for the air resistance would be really small.

[–] RickAstleyfounddead@lemy.lol 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago

I don't think Newton was dumb enough to think air resistance isn't a factor

[–] cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm confused why the ponytail is getting blown forward.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Gel. Lots and lots of gel.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I interpreted that as just how she has her hair up; to put it another way, her hair is short enough and bound tightly enough that it would maintain that angle with or without wind.

[–] cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

I considered that but I didn't find it plausible due to the "pull" on the hair at the base of the ponytail. Unless that's a very oddly shaped skull.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pretty comic funny

th-2737741988

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Did you mean "Adventurous"?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Gotta time it with the breaks

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Oh I get it, it's cuz the vehicle is moving.