91
submitted 1 month ago by dvdnet62@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] uservoid1@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago

The issue can be resolved by allocating an additional 250 MB of storage space to the recovery partition. Details on how to do that can be found here.

However, at least on Windows 10, Microsoft has acknowledged that an automatic resolution for this issue will not be released and as such, the only way to fix this is manually.

So there is a solution and the headline should be "Microsoft admits it can't automatically fix..."

[-] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

If it can be done manually, I don't see any reason it can't be done automatically. Other than just not wanting to allocate the person-power to it.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Letting the installer autonomously adjust the recovery partition may open up vulnerabilities where malicious software can be placed in recovery. I don't know how accurate that is, but it makes sense to me, and would be why they want it done on a case by case basis as needed and not just a mass fix to all installs whether they need it or not.

[-] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

That security concern is there whether it is for this or something else.

[-] uservoid1@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Would you like automatic update to mess with your disk partition allocations without requesting explicit permission to do so? As long as searching the error code would give me the explanation and solution I'm Ok with manual fix this time

[-] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Me no, but for most users with only windows installed and not dual booting, having it automatically doing it would probably be fine and bailing out when it detects a more advance configuration such as extra partitions would make sense. Then display a message about manual intervention is required or something.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 7 points 1 month ago

Why would they do that when they can use this as yet another push to move people to windows 11.

[-] Roopappy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

That was my thought. I'm not sure if it's based in science, but I remember being a huge fan of Windows 2000 back in the day, and Microsoft pushed a final service pack that made it highly unstable in 2005, and refused to update/fix it. My theory was that they were trying to push everyone to Windows XP, but I'm prone to thinking the worst of large corporations.

[-] eugenia@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

TWO of my laptops were bit by that bug/error. Not one. Two.

But what they offered was not a real solution. I'm an experienced computer user, and still didn't wanna mess with that "solution".

This was done just to force people to upgrade to a Win11 (and maybe get a new PC too, if their old one couldn't run Win11). If not that, then simply, incompetence in general.

It's all laughable, really.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I used to have a very nice laptop that had a blue screen error I could never figure out, I wonder if this was it. Actually I still have it 🤔

[-] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

One issue is that some people are still on windows 7 installs that were upgraded. Windows 7 had a large enough partition for then, but the upgrade now needs more. Unfortunately 2009 Microsoft didn't anticipate that this should be bigger for 2023 installs. Making it larger is a hassle I wouldn't want to code either.

[-] eugenia@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Both my laptops were Win10-native, not upgrades from previous versions.

[-] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago

This is honestly such a pile of shit from Microsoft. Right…. Grandma is going to resize her partitions with those ridiculously cryptic instructions. She’s totally going to figure out which partition we’re talking about, she’s totally going to open a command line interface as admin, heck she totally even knows to find those instructions. Its hard enough for people to distinguish between “ya that’s windows update, click that button” vs “no that’s a phishing attack, never click that button”

Now the rest of us who know what we’re doing have to fix everyone’s PCs in the family. Keep pushing everyone to iPads and Linux Microsoft…

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

IPad? From an even worse company? Linux all the way.

[-] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

For my 75 year old mother who doesn’t do anything besides Facebook. Ya an iPad is perfect! ;)

She thinks it’s a full blown computer and it’s impossible to break or install a virus on it. iPads can be surprisingly good for that purpose…

[-] lud@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

NO it's essential that grandma learn Linux!

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I guess you're right... Need a Linux distros like that so that can also change.

[-] dukatos@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

My 74 years old mother is using Linux and KDE for last 15 years. Facebook - works, Skype - works, solitaire - works 🙂

[-] darganon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oh no, Grandma's bitlocker will be vulnerable when the attacker gets physical access to her machine!

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

If grandma uses TPM and has some specific device.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

What a shit show.

[-] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

At what point do you just dissolve the company if it can’t be bothered to fix a product they’re selling

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

But you can upgrade to Windows 11? 🤔

this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
91 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

33331 readers
257 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS