In before a fascist wannabe billionaire buys the weather channel just to destroy any credibility it has and hijack the climate change debate. Even change the name of weather channel to something like “Y”.
Let the enshittification begin.
You reminded me of this story from 2018 when the Trump team tried to put someone in charge of government weather data so that they could shutdown free public access, allowing private companies to use it and commercialize it
“ One particularly alarming thread explored in Lewis’s reporting follows the ongoing efforts of Barry Myers, the chief executive of AccuWeather and Trump’s pick to run the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to privatize the agency’s practice of collecting and analyzing data that helps generate weather warnings meant to keep all of us, and not just those who can pay for it, safe.”
https://www.vulture.com/2018/07/the-coming-storm-michael-lewis-audiobook-review.html
God he sucks. Why don't we do private firefighters and police while we're at it.
Steve Bannon is sadly already ahead of you:
The two networks’ shared ownership has alarmed some meteorologists, who say that WeatherNation is helping to legitimize the extreme viewpoints aired on Real America’s Voice, occasionally sharing its forecasts on the political network; at times the networks feature the same advertisers. These critics also argue that in its own coverage, WeatherNation fosters climate change skepticism by shunning any mention of the established links between human-driven climate warming and the disasters the channel covers, thus discouraging viewers from considering the consequences of climate change
If paywall:
Another article with tons of linked sources: https://checkmyads.org/branded/how-proctor-gamble-ended-up-funding-steve-bannons-war-room/
He'll probably rename it to 🌦️
*Databases crash noises
This timeline is disturbingly absurd, making it increasingly likely that we could indeed face such a situation.
Too late, it's been shit for years now.
Same firm that acquired LogMeIn (LastPass) and MyFitnessPal--and after those acquisitions both MyFitnessPal and LastPass quickly moved to worsen the free tiers of services in favor of their paid subscription models.
That's incredible. Both of those apps INSTANTLY became so much worse after they were bought out.
I used to love Weather Underground but stopped using it once The Weather Channel took over but crazy that IBM own that, what an odd acquisition.
I still use it, mostly because I've been using them for nearly two decades and they've been the most consistently accurate in forecasting for my area.
But since the IBM acquisition, the app has been so slow to load.
Just use the National Weather Service. It is where they get all of their data. They just bundle it up and sell it.
TIL IBM owns the Weather Channel.
Only the mobile app. They don't own the tv channel.
Weather that is a good decision or not remains to be seen
What is your forecast about it?
Hazy.
Hail of a good pun line going on.
Please don't make Weather Underground shitty. It's the only weather website that gives accurate information around here.
Hate to tell you this, but it’s been shitty since the NEXRAD feeds broke and they never bothered to fix ‘em.
Maybe for you, but all the other weather websites I've tried are wrong. Even DarkSky was wrong half the time. It said sunny skies when we were in the middle of a blizzard once. I don't know, maybe there's something weird about where I am.
I had a similar experience with Dark Sky, but Weather Underground was always great. The weird part of it is that I’m near Chicago, where the NWS office got trashed for their awful handling of the forecast and response to the storms that led to the Plainfield F5 in 1990 - bad radar was often cited as a reason for that response, so NEXRAD especially has been key to NWS’s improvement here.
It’s www.weather.gov/lot for me now.
Oh wow, weather.gov looks really nice these days. It used to be bare bones. I may use it from now on, thanks!
Edit: The only thing I don't like is I can't see where it has the current heat index.
They've been shitty since TWC bought them. Maybe a little before when they killed their old web interface which was informative and fast and replaced it with a new design that was difficult to read information, and worst of all, slow as fuck. That's about when I stopped subscribing.
Maybe the Wunderground KDE plugin will be revived now that IBM isn't the one handing out API keys...
Cool, could they sell Redhat to someone not actively evil, and fuck right off now?
Today I learned that IBM is still a major thing
IBM will still sell you a brand new, updated mainframe in 2023.
They’re also in the open source software space (IBM owns Red Hat, a software company that has a lot of projects for Linux. Red Hat has their own Linux distro too)
Which threats users to had their subscription cancelled when they share the source code according to GPL.
Yeah. I agree with ya there, Red Hat screwed over Alma and Rocky with that decision. I can see the utility of those two distros for testing before committing to RHEL.
Plus, if Oracle has room to try to be the “good guys”, you’ve really screwed up
We did away with that pesky business failures. Now all corporate are eternal.
I knew they were a thing because I run into them in IT from time to time... but had no idea they owned the weather channel. Wild.
I work with their iseries servers daily, they are very much still a thing
Makes sense. Now they can focus more on their core business. Google recently sold it’s domain registry, I think it might be the same thing.
I think it’s fair to look at IBM with a more cynical eye. Historically it’s been “acquire, way you’ll make no changes, wait a bit, make changes that piss off 80% of your customer base.” Somewhere in there is a “reduce customer service effectiveness” step that is distinct from “make changes.”
After that it’s either “sell it off to the highest bidder” or “keep at it because who else are the customers gonna use?”
It's a bummer that Google sold it's registry to ~~GoDaddy~~Squarespace.
EDIT: seems like I remember it incorrectly
I hear this a lot, but every company I've been a part of that did it seemed to be a bad idea. If a division makes money, the only reason to sell is because you believe the investment in that division can be used to make more money (for less). Getting rid of a profitable entity is usually greed based.
It's corporate-speak that means nothing. The same company "focused on it's core business" today will buy something unrelated sometime later and say it's "poised for growth in a growing market".
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
