104

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 26 points 7 months ago

Finally, pure functional rust.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 24 points 7 months ago

Neat FP style. Pretty verbose though. Someone should invent a terser syntax so you don't need to write do_two_things everywhere. It's a common operation so maybe it could even be a single character.

[-] TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

If you know about rust you know it's a programmable programming language, meaning that you can make macros. There could be a macro that would do that but 1. Macros is rust code to write rust code so they have the complexity of rust squared 2. I said to myself the only macros I will allow myself to use in this challenge is println and allow

[-] jendrik@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 months ago

Like a semicolon? No, too boring. What about >>=

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

; is just a monad after all

[-] colournoun@beehaw.org 15 points 7 months ago

Isn’t this basically how lisp works?

[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Yup! Also languages in the ML family and others I'm sure.

[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 months ago

Yeah, semicolons are ugly anyway and they'd ruin the beautiful expression of your code.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

On a more serious note, does rust suffer some of the same issues as JavaScript when it comes to omitting semicolons?

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 10 points 7 months ago
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Do not expect to find anything like Javascript craziness on other languages. Or you'll be severely disappointed.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

There are plenty of languages with warts at least as bad as JavaScript's. Bash, PHP, C, even relatively sane languages like Python still have huge issues like implicit variable declaration.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

JS and PHP are by themselves in a special ring of hell.

[-] TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Bash is a bigger one. Luckily there's nushell

for (const item in items) { }

!=

for (const item of items) { }
[-] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago

Still better than

for _, item in ipairs(items)
[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Nope. In Rust, a semicolon denotes a statement while a lack of semicolon is an expression so you can't just omit them at will. This does lead to cool things though like if/else blocks being able to produce values if they end in an expression. But the expression type is checked so you're less likely to make a mistake. You can see an example here: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/flow_control/if_else.html

In JavaScript I never skip semicolons because I've seen those subtle bugs.

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago

POV: your project manager went in an "cleaned" it all up by removing them - your (sic) welcome! 😜

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

Now do it without using commas

[-] TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

Challenge accepted! If I won't procrastinate from this procrastinating, tomorrow will be a version 2 without commas!

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

After programming in Go for nearly a decade, the idea of going back to needing semicolons brings me pain. Rust seems cool, but semicolons 🤢

[-] TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago

As you can see, rust allows you to not put semicolons at the end of code blocks. The presence of semicolons is not a language killer. It's a very hard language, but its worth it.

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I agree. Semicolons are a small "tradeoff" (personally not for me) for such a great language.

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

The presence of semicolons is not a language killer.

I'm not saying it is. But every time I have to work in a language that requires semicolons I'm constantly forgetting them and constantly reminded of how nice it is to not have to care in Go.

[-] NoisyFlake@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago
[-] TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago
[-] NoisyFlake@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

How did I not recognize the font I've been using for years, lol. Guess it just looks even better on a HiDPI display.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Rust's semicolon means something like "There's nothing to see here! Move along! Move along!", so yeah, you don't actually need any.

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

Would you rather have semicolons or significant newlines?

[-] TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

Semicolons. Statement's can be written in multiple lines such as rust io::stdin(&mut foo) .unwrap(). Idk if it would work if the newlines were significant. Also when I paste something, it could be ready hard for the formatter to format it.

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

~~You can replace return foo with just foo.~~

[-] Username@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

Not here, because it's being used as a function argument.

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

Oh wow. I hate this lol

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Well you have a variable foo being mutated. Maybe that's what they're for?

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
104 points (93.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19463 readers
15 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS