7
Electric cars (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago by thisfro@slrpnk.net to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

As much as I hate cars, removing them is only possible inside cities. North America has a very large rural area(and population) that needs to be converted away from fossil fuels.

[-] Habnab@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

North America has a large suburban population. The rural population is almost entirely dependent on fossil fuels for the near future because of infrastructure scarcity and the energy density of fossil fuels.

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe yes, but a large part of society at least in America and Europe live in cities or suburbs, where cars are just bs

[-] darkmugglet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Sigh...I own an EV and I will tell you that my reasons for buying it are less environmental and more practical. Not having to go to a gas station (charge at home) or how I literally have way more power than I need or that it's just fun to drive. You can shit on EVs, but in all reality they are a superior car if you don't get hung up on the fuel. I want to be better about the environment, but honestly, my EV is hands down my all time favorite car (and it's not a Tesla). So before you mock em, go test drive a few.

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A "superior car" is still a fucking car

[-] corm@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Oh shut up, ecars cause less environmental damage than normal cars by far. Yes they require lithium. The lithium required doesn't get close to the damage of 300k miles worth of gas.

"but power plants burn coal for that electricity"

Not mine. I live in portland and have signed up for 100% renewable power. That's a your-city problem. You should work on that.

[-] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you're arguing points that weren't made.

Individually owned automobiles and the systems required to support them are wasteful and polluting no matter how you power them.

Electric cars are better, yes. But their popularity is in a large part because they allow us to mostly maintain the status quo.

Do you think they are a sustainable long-term solution? Should we be planning our future around paved roads made almost exclusively for personally owned mostly single-occupant vehicles?

[-] corm@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

It's two months later and I've done a 180 on this opinion and went from "fuck gas cars" to "fuck all cars".

The car infrastructure is the shitty part, not so much the cars

[-] CurtAdams@urbanists.social 2 points 1 year ago

@corm @1993_toyota_camry Sort of? All cars ruin our lives. But gas cars also ruin the planet, where electric are substially better now and will be almost carbon free in 30 years or so. Getting rid of cars in general is very desirable, but getting rid of gas cars is an existential necessity.

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Still cars 🤷

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Electric cars help pollution like filtered cigarettes help smoker health. It's a tangible improvement, but on the grand scale of things it's not a significant improvement.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago

Please post links, not screenshots of content

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, will keep that in mind

[-] version_unsorted@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I actually like the laziness of just images. Links for extra context and source are always appreciated though

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9653 readers
439 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS