this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
994 points (91.3% liked)

General Discussion

13508 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Just add tax brackets up to 99% and have graduated lending taxes

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
  • Introduce a corporate death penalty for grave offences: a business is declared bankrupt and sent in to liquidation even if it is financially sound.
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What would it take to actually get ranked choice voting? That would need a constitutional amendment right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree with a lot of this, especially ranked choice voting. Don't agree with abolishing the electoral college though. Rural voters and urban voters are generally quite different, if you get rid of the electoral college the rural voters will be completely ignored by every politician simply because there are fewer of them and they are spread out more. I don't think that means their priorities should be invalidated.

That said, I would add one thing. Abolish primary votes. Political parties can nominate as many or as few people as they wish, anybody with enough signatures can get their name on the final ballot. The current primary system basically disenfranchises voters in any state that isn't in the first 10 or 15 primary elections. Half the candidates will have dropped out by the time their state votes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Term limit for congress

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Might not be need anymore with a handful of the items listed but campaign finance reform to show where all of a campaigns money came from and went. Also thought there was a better term but can't fully remember.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Social democracy leaves power in the hands of the capitalists, they only tolerate reforms like this when capitalism is threatened, and they will (and have) eroded as soon as the threat is gone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί