this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
211 points (97.7% liked)

News

36142 readers
3474 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even more major than the current major sanctions...

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 83 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Israel represents a massive foothold in the region for the US, as well as facilitating all of those new oil pipelines running through Gaza. Palestinians are probably going to be wiped off the face of the Earth in order to keep that sweet sweet oil money in American politician's pockets.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So either they were going light on sanctions despite Russia invading and attacking a sovereign nation or they're lying about adding sanctions just for diplomatic clout.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it's possible that new avenues for sanctions have opened up since the last round which the State Dept can now pursue.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

interesting, thanks for the education. I also came here to shout "how are there sanctions left to give?!", and I didn't consider 'rules of engagement' would apply like that.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

time passes, new opportunities present themselves. for example: a lot of investigations into where Russian oligarchs have been hiding their money have come to fruition, so seizing those funds through various channels has become an option. New ways Russians have been funneling money through backchannels have presented themselves meaning there are new channels for pursuit.

things chang over time, meaning that new sanctions may be possible. there’s a lot we, as civilians, won’t and can’t know.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

The idea is that you don't dump all of your sanctions at once onto Russia, because then they have nowhere else to go but to escalation. The west wants to give Putin economic "off-ramps" so he can withdraw from Ukraine out of financial pressure rather than with violence.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who told you about the double secret sanctions???

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Somebody broke Rule 1 of the Double Secret Sanctions Club.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I bet they are going to cancel Putin's Netflix account now. Could start WW3

[–] FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whoa whoa whoa, that's maybe too harsh. Maybe just downgrade him to ad-supported?

[–] splicerslicer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

People like you literally want to see the world burn. Sanctions I understand, but advertisements, might as well threaten him with waterboarding.

[–] CosmicApe@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Government: kills one person
USA: sanctions! All the sanctions!

Other government: kills 29,000 persons
USA: would you, idk, like some more bombs?

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So have they been holding back this whole time?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It would start to become less about sanctioning russia and more about applying sanctions to anyone who does any kind of business with them

[–] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

They'll teach'em!

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How many more sanctions can the US still put on Russia? They've shown that western sanctions mean nothing as long as India and China are willing to do business.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

There always the option of sanctioning countries that don't sanction the target country.

This should already be happening to Russia. It should be a ratcheting strategy of continuing sanctions till Russia retreat back to their own borders.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Awwwe yeah let's get it.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

sounds serious