this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
462 points (98.5% liked)

News

36891 readers
3250 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under legal pressure to address Wisconsin’s “Swiss cheese” and oddly shaped districts, the Legislature approved redrawn maps that promise to create a new dynamic in a state known for its pivotal role in national politics.

Wisconsin’s dinosaur-shaped legislative district could soon be history.

The curiously drawn district and other oddities associated with the state’s extreme gerrymandering would be erased in new voting maps passed this week by the Wisconsin Legislature.

A state Supreme Court decision finally forced Wisconsin Republicans to cede an advantage they enjoyed for more than a decade with maps that made the state one of the nation’s foremost examples of gerrymandering.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If only we could do this in Ohio...

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Constitutionally they have to. That did not stop Republicans from forcing an unconstitutional map, or coursebut at least it was slightly more representative.

Speaking of that...what happened with that lawsuit? I know the Supreme Court said the map was illegal back in 2022.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

Ohio's Rs got around it by saying a map that reflected the proportions of elected offices held by each party was "proportionally representative"

It just so happened that due to previous Gerrymandering Republicans held 80% of the elected offices in the state of Ohio.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Doesn't Ohio have a thing where people can change the constitution with just a petition and enough votes on the ballot?

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It does, and a petition is collected signatures. But it still needs to dodge Republican interference (they will probably make the ballot language prejudicial), negative ads about “unelected bureaucrats”, and actually pass.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They passed constitutional abortion rights though, kinda seems like gerrymandering might actually be something that could pass

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It does and we have... Multiple fucking times. They didn't get the message (really obnoxious in the case of the most recent one where they ignored the Ohio Supreme Court because they knew they could wait one cycle and have control of it), we're trying again soon with a "you don't get a say in map making anymore Mr. Politician" approach soon.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Fellow ohioan here, I don't even know what district I'm in anymore because it changes every 2 years when they rig the maps again.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

And every other state.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

GET ABSOLUTELY FUCKED VOS!!!! After all the "we're gonna impeach" blah blah whine cry cry cope you slimy shit stain.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If we want to end gerrymandering but we consistently need districts to be redrawn due to population changes, why not inventovise the nominees to do the work for us?

Release the population data map. Whomever can create the required amount of districts, with the appropriate population with lines of the shortest length has their map used. After Avery census, where the data is release, set a deadline for a certain time, say 1 year, for submissions to be considered.

[–] Throw_away_migrator@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Honestly, seeking compactness/shortest lines can create gerrymandered districts too. It can result neighborhoods or population centers being split into multiple districts and having their power diluted.

Drawing convenient/straight boarders can have lasting negative impacts. Just ask the British.

The solution is... Complicated. David Wasserman did a great piece on this many years ago for 538. It's worth a read

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/hating-gerrymandering-is-easy-fixing-it-is-harder/

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The headline is very misleading.

The new maps do NOT end GOP gerrymandering. The new maps are still very much gerrymandered in favor of the GOP. Just a bit less-so.

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I wan not expecting the GOP Minority super Majority to give up power that easily

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

The sad reality with decent judges. They don't force their ideals like the corrupt ones do.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

All I hear in this article is “could” and “would”

[–] aeharding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Awesome news. Vote! This is the outcome of vote turnout for justice Janet Protasiewicz!