915

People keep talking about "Federalizing the National Guard" and now you've got other States pledging their NG to Texas in defiance of the Supreme Court (see image).

So is this what CW2 looks like?

P.S. I'm a Brit

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 10 months ago

Could they not at least bunch up a bit so it's easier to build a wall around them?

[-] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 10 points 10 months ago

Oh, this'll be fun in the future when people try to whitewash it. We'll have another chance to follow up by asking, "a state's right to what, specifically?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Ayo check out the Cornfederacy up there!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I'm an american and an idiot. I thought the National Guard was a Federal organization?
Regardless Governor Abbott is a hateful idiot, along with all of the other leaders in Texas. I just left Texas because I can't handle paying their salaries anymore, though I went to Louisiana where they are somehow more corrupt but also bigger idiots.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 10 points 10 months ago

It is. It got federalized during World War 1 and later the supreme Court basically ruled that the federal government wasn't allowed to do that but they weren't going to make the federal government give control back to the individual states anyway.

These days some states have state guards, but not all do. Of those that do, a significant amount are absolute jokes. It's fairly logical, of course. What state has needed an army in the last hundred years?

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I thought the National Guard was a Federal organization

I read this shortly after posting and apparently NG is State managed unless it gets "federalized" which means the Federal Government takes over.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Dumbasses once again saying, "Now is the time!" when they're clearly outnumbered and outgunned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised.

Like even if this thing with states acting up doesn't work out the people they are speaking too are definitely gonna still be riled up.

It seems obvious to me that they are probably planning something for the upcoming election since they would try and make sure that another "election steal" wouldn't happen again.

The only way that I see this not turning into a civil war is for government to somehow change the conversation drastically so that people aren't asking these questions.

Because if people begin asking these questions then people planning to do stuff are gonna be even more anxious and try and do the thing earlier.

I'm not sure how they would change the conversation though because all the republican population is going to just ignore them and still think we are heading towards a civil war making it just more likely to happen.

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 months ago

The US is the next empire to fall. I am a US citizen and i am taking steps to GTFO if needed. I have an e-residency and ID card from another nation and am working up to the investment for full citizenship.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

IDK but I got shut down when I asked a few weeks ago.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] iquanyin@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

“take over texas” as if the federal govt wasn’t already in control of the states. the states pay federal taxes, and they receive various federal benefits. texas isn’t some separate nation. it’s just one of the regular 50 states.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

All of the recent news surrounding Texas tells me we need to return to a more literal reading of the 10th Amendment. Bring back dual federalism.

[-] Welt@lazysoci.al 8 points 10 months ago

Neither an American nor knowledgeable about constitutional and amendment law - would you mind elaborating please?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, the civil war 2 looks like mass shootings and terrorists attacks. It started with the Oklahoma City Bombing. Liberals just refuse to acknowledge it's existence.

There's an argument to be made, though, tha the US has always been in a state of civil war. The Spartans would symbolically declare war on their slaves every year. That's kind of what slavery is: a constant war on a portion of the population. That's aside from the whole genocide of native folks. Since the 13th amendment didn't actually ban slavery, it never ended and if you look at standing rock, you know that whole native genocide thing never ended either.

Then when you contextualize all this with stuff like the Red Summer, you realize the recent violence is just the normal terrorism that white supremacists do every now and then to get control back. There probably won't be a war with two side, more just escalation violence from one side leading to the systematic murder a huge chunk of the population. The question is if it will be officially sanctioned like the Holocaust, or continue with the ad-hoc stochastic terrorism like the Rwandan genocide and the Serbian ethnic cleansing.

I expected more snipers, bombings, and attacks on infrastructure but if Trump wins it's definitely gas chambers.

Democrats are too afraid of "real war" to actually do something about this. If they did they might have to deal with the mess for real and open themselves up to political challengers from the left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago
[-] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

Tangentially related: https://mander.xyz/comment/7170064 that was after Jan. 6, and no we fucked around and didnt do any of this shit.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Serious question. Couldn't Texas just hold a referendum to scede?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Sort of. According to the US, they couldn't. Secession is a denial of the authority of the US though, so what the US says doesn't really matter.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
915 points (93.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27028 readers
1520 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS