599
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] simple@lemm.ee 188 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

50,000 reviews now. It's a shame, I used to play OW1 a lot even after they stopped providing new content for it. Came to OW2 and I just couldn't be arsed to grind for characters I don't have unlocked. You need to win 35 games, and since there's a basically forced 50% winrate that means you need to play 70 games to unlock a character each time. Wanted to play Ramattra, saw he's locked, uninstalled and didn't look back. The monetization is terrible. The balance feels worse than it's ever been.

This wouldn't be such a problem if they didn't literally SHUT DOWN OVERWATCH 1 to shove people into the cash shop grind sequel

[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

I know next to nothing about neither Ow1 or OW2, but from the sound of it they turned OW2 into a game focused on grinding, where you can pay to skip (part of) the grind. Is my assessment correct? If so they must've looked at War Thunder and taken that idea.

[-] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. OW1 cost money, but you got all the content. The only paid service was cosmetic outfits for the different characters. You could buy loot boxes for cosmetics. But you had all of the characters, maps, game modes, etc available to begin with. You got the whole game, then could grind for cosmetics.

OW2 takes that and flips it on its head. The game is free, but each character costs money. The problem is that they shut down OW1, so now the players who owned 1 are having to grind for everything. They’ve also had some weird server bugs, with players getting indefinitely locked out of characters they already own.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] simple@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Yep. The gameplay itself has no p2w or grinding in general, but now you have to grind to unlock characters. In OW1 you also used to get showered with cool cosmetics just for playing, in OW2 they turned it into a paid battle pass and a rotating cash shop where a single skin costs like $20 and F2P users get basically nothing. The thing is set up in a way to scam whales by selling them things that used to be free for hundreds of dollars.

I would still play if it were just cosmetics but now every time a hero releases you have to grind to unlock them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's a wonder to me why anyone would ever continue to play overwatch 2. 1 was fun for a time and I played a single match of 2 to realize that they ruined the game and never went back. The game died when 1 was shut down because 2 was never going to be successful with how shit it is.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Zuberi@lemmy.world 185 points 1 year ago

Good. They ruined the game. I paid for it and Now I need a battle pass to unlock the 2 champs? Blizzard, eat a sack of shit. Free Hong Kong. Fuck the CCP

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 84 points 1 year ago

unlike Baldur's Gate 3, absolutely everything about this game was designed specifically with microtrans in mind

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago

Oh my God, you can't just say microtrans. The proper terminology is "gender dysphoric little person"

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Actually that's the wrong use of that word in this context. It's actually a "queer questioning point of sale system" he's talking about.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

No no no thats also wrong, it stands for micro transmission. Ya know for small vehicles.

[-] kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Even you got it wrong! They were talking about the micro figurines for transformers! How you could miss that!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

could be short for microtransient, and then we're talking about little hobos.. and who doesn't want to talk about little hobos..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 1984@lemmy.today 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They've been awful since Activision got involved. I knew that was the end the day the news broke, people told me I was wrong. I wish.

Also they sexually harassed an employee to suicide. That tells you all you need to know.

[-] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Blizzard has been on a downward trend for a lot longer than 3 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

As it fucking deserved, honestly.

Fuck Blizzard, shutting down OW1. Pieces of shit.

[-] verysoft@kbin.social 65 points 1 year ago

Good, they absolutely fucking butchered the game just to sell cosmetics and heroes.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] sp6@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

It's currently at 10% positive reviews. I think once this chart updates in ~11.5 hrs, it will officially be the worst-reviewed steam game of all time: https://steam250.com/bottom100

[-] koyo@ani.social 36 points 1 year ago

blizzard is ass. i hope they go bankrupt one day.

[-] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

As if there weren't enough money behind Activision-Blizzard, Microsoft is about to buy them. You might as well wish for the oceans to dry up.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/11/23779039/microsoft-activision-blizzard-ftc-trial-win

[-] echoplex21@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I really hope MS doesn’t take a laissez faire attitude with Act-Blizz and actually take a real hands on approach. I know they’re not the best at handling things but there has to be some type of change for their studio.

[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ironically the one thing MS seems to be great at is managing game companies. Granted, that’s by usually just leaving them the hell alone, so yea, im hoping they fire all the higher ups at activision and hand it to one of their other game companies

[-] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Which companies have they been great at managing?

[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I may have made my point badly, they are great at managing their gaming properties by not managing them. They usually just buy the company and let the people that made the game studio great keep doing what they do.

As opposed to someone like EA which takes the studio down to a BDSM basement and violates them like they are in a snuff film

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago
[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

From a shit company.

They earned their reputation pretty hard

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

They probably had it coming.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
599 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16948 readers
308 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS