348
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

wow just wow while i can't say i didn't see this one coming but it always amazes me where greed could lead someone

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] code_is_speech@lemmy.fmhy.ml 42 points 1 year ago

Google is an ad company. To them, a web browser is nothing more than a tool for collecting user data and delivering ads.

When you use a chromium based browser you are allowing google, an ad company, to decide what the future of web browsing should look like. And this is the result.

Firefox is the ONLY browser which is genuinely competing with google. Do you think ad and tracking blockers are going to get better or worse once they die out, and literally every major browser is running on chromium?

Use firefox and u-block origin. Enjoy a superior, ad free, browsing experience, and support the future of an open web.

[-] crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's so encouraging to hear so many pro Firefox opinions lately. Then I remember I'm logged into the pirate instance of a federated platform and anti-corporate sentiment is probably as high as it gets.

Sadly most younger people haven't even heard of Firefox.

[-] Ragerist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most young people are basically tech illiterate. Yeah they are fantastic with new apps and phones. But have zero idea how any of it works under the hood.

Ask them to transfer a file from a computer to a USB drive, most will not know how. They have no idea how a file system is structured or even that an app has to specifically made for different platforms.. e.g. Facebook app on Apple is completely different from Facebook on Android and the two will contain different bugs and different settings.

We are almost back to default browser = internet

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Seilorks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Most younger people have heard of it. Using what came with their computer is just easier to them though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

If you're demanding I watch ads, it's not "free". you're demanding my time and probably attention.

I really think we need to stop with this idea that "Something is free" because no money is exchanged. Some stuff ARE free, there are repos on git, where you can download software, there are websites that ask for nothing. However Gmail, Youtube, reddit, and the rest are not "Free" just because they aren't directly asking for money.

[-] Soltros@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More people should try out Tubesync. It's a tool you can host yourself that essentially uses yt-dl as a backend and lets you subscribe to channels, and it'll download videos as they come out. Gets you away from the ads and you can archive content you like forever.

https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

[-] Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they'll ever make that impossible. I used to go on a couple of 6 hour drives twice a week for a long time. A lot of the drive didn't have cell service, as it was thru a bunch of mountains. I ended up making a python script that downloaded podcast episodes to listen to, and to force my brother to watch Your Mom's House, when he was with me on the drive.

It was surprisingly simple to do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nickiam2@aussie.zone 26 points 1 year ago

NewPipe for android is still working. Much better than the official app IMO, no ads and it actually shows the videos you subscribed to.

[-] jags0333@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

YouTube ReVanced has been fine for me too

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trepX@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd say to you all: get used to bombshells dropping! At some point the investor pyramid scheme will go crashing down. It might be now. All those companies were on borrowed time. Until investors realised that "data" isn't valuable on its own - it's what you make of it. There needs to be a product that generates revenue. Spoiler alert, it is hard to come up with a business plan that takes plain usage data and makes the technical challenges worthwhile to squeeze money from it. I can feel it myself as data scientist. The honeymoon's over, investors want to see ROI.

I mean this cycle will probably recover in a few years when the markets recover but still - some lessons stick

[-] Ragerist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy shit! Your post made me realize that we are in Dot-com bubble burst 2.0

It's the exact same thing, everyone and their dog, had to have a webpage. Investors finally realized that most websites had no way of generating money, and stuff came crashing down.

Same thing is happening now!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GINTegg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Youtube should be archived, burnt to the ground, and replaced

[-] PirateForDaLolz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago

I'm not so sure that this is anything to worry about. It's just another step in the game of cat and mouse. Is it annoying? Of course! But if/when it goes mainstream, ad blockers are just going to push updates that make it possible to block the ad block blocker. uBlock Origin does a really good job at blocking ad block blockers on most sites.

[-] hydra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

True, especially with the fuckfuckadblock list which really mitigates most aDvLoKC d3TeKteD bullshit.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] techgearwhips@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago
[-] ivyZorz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

This. I’m pretty sure this is a result of the ad engine changes they made to chrome a few months ago. Manifest V2 is what enables uBlock Origin to be so effective iirc and they’re removing it in chrome in favor of Manifest V3.

Firefox on the other hand still supports V2.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] xT1TANx@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Having to watch ads isn't free. It costs me my time and it's limited.

[-] JesusTheCarpenter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Technically you pay to use Youtube by watching adds. People sometimes forget that there are no free lunches.

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

As long as there are CEOs getting payed more than i could earn in my life for one year, i'm good with my free lunch.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Greed? I mean they are not a charity and ads pay for the service. Don't get me wrong I use ad block but to call it greed..

[-] The_Infinite_Monkey@lemdit.com 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, greed. Google is an extremely profitable company, wanting more money than they already have is completely unreasonable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Gainwhore@lemmy.fmhy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Whats up with all these online companies just deciding to be assholes this year.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Companies are becoming even more greedy recently across the board and at a rapid pace. Some people would want you to believe Youtube wouldn't generate billions of dollars as income annually for Alphabet for some reason. But the truth is the platform is extremely profitable already. Youtube simply wants even more now because competition has done the same. We've seen prices spiraling up and quality dropping in pretty much all sectors of the economy and this trend will continue for the forseeable future.

In short: Because they can (some are really stretching their boundaries, though)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Banzai51@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Like another poster said, investors are pushing for profits. The Sillicon Valley model of throwing money at it until they figure it out is suffering with the downturn in the markets. So with the VC and investor money drying up, sites are pushing to make money to keep the lights on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Orbitrix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This seems somewhat intentionally coordinated, so that the squeeze everyone into submission.

[-] Bercto@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It is coordinated but also driven by purely financial factors that changed over the last year. Interests are rising and suddenly those tech companies can't just live by growth alone, they have to find ways to be profitable.

[-] iptvsports28@vlemmy.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Won't someone think of the poor tech companies?

(Just making the joke, not at you. You are correct, that is why it's happening now.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

No way I'll use YouTube with ads. The amount of your lifetime they waste is what I'd consider disrespectful to their users. Even if the ads were bearable, I wouldn't turn off my ad blocker on any Google site for tracking alone.

I also don't see myself subscribing to YouTube Premium, firstly because it's too expensive (stop including your music streaming service and make it cheaper maybe?), but also because YouTube is just a platform with a lot of not curated content that YouTube had no part in creating.

Let's see how the cat and mouse games between YouTube and ad blockers and alternative frontends go. If it's too much of a hassle, I'll just stop using YouTube. I don't miss Twitter, I don't miss Reddit, and I won't miss YouTube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Arodg25@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Greed didn't lead someone, this is a shareholder entity. Each shareholder doesn't even have to think about greed. The entity does it all for them. That's why companies can do horrible things and everyone can sleep at night. It's always the entity that did it not them. Shareholders are the root of all evil in this world today.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

I haven't had this happen using ublock origin, but if they do figure out how to block ublock origin, adnausiem (ublock origin fork) might work. It's a fork of ublock origin that tricks the ad providers into thinking you clicked on every ad, which not only bypasses a lot of adblock detectors, it Actively costs them money by polluting their ad data with garbage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] doolittle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Really not worth watching a 10 minute video that has four minutes of YouTube ads and a minute of a sponsor pitch by the creator.

[-] Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Not the main point, but this is the first time I've seen "allowlisted". Lol

...are they trying to avoid saying whitelisted because of the word "white"?

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Fontasia@feddit.nl 8 points 1 year ago

I just don't get how these providers (Specifically Reddit with the API lockdown and now the stranglehold on mods, Twitter's new login requirement, and YouTube now cracking down on adblockers) are missing the point that their sites live and die by user generated content.

I understand these sites are hugely expensive to run, but if you keep alienating those who are bringing users to your site in the first place, people will stop submitting and people will stop visiting.

[-] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Well, realistically there is a good chance that this will turn out just fine business-wise. They don't care if they lose some engagement or if the quality goes to shit. It's all good, as long as it makes some money.

In my opinion, this sort of model should be considered anti-competitive. It has become apparent that these services operate on a model where they offer a service that is too good to be true in order to kill the competition, and then they switch to their actual profitable business plan. If you think about it, peertube is a much more sensible economical model with its federation and p2p streaming. But nobody has ever cared about it because huge tech giants offer hosting & bandwith "for free". The evil part of youtube is not the ads, its the fact that it allowed us to bypass them long enough for the entire planet to become dependent on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] littlecolt@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Holy cow, is the real? On YouTube desktop? Or just on mobile?

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Revanced it is

[-] Anon@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

FreeTube/Piped on PC

ReVanced on droid

uYou+ on 🍎 phone

SmartTubeNext on 📺

Youtube can do the fuck they want on their website

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Manticore@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 year ago

The more ad-riddled they make the platform to try and monetise users, the more they make adblocks necessary to even be usable.

I didn't use to both with adblockers. I didn't like ads, but they didn't affect me enough for me to go through any effort blocking them.

Now I use blockers everywhere, on every platform. Even for creators I like, because I know how little they actually make for ads - so how bout instead of watching 12 hours of ads so they can get 2c, I just send them a dollar or buy their merch every once in a while to not watch ads at all? Etc.

Ads could have had a place. There are ads that serve a purpose, that have minimal disruption but still give businesses a way to develop awareness for those who might want to use them.

Movie trailers (including when they stopped trailing movies and started leading them) are examples of 'acceptable ads' to me. When I purchase something from a store and they include a printed card from their sponsor. When sports teams have logos for being sponsored. A work van with the business logo parked while out on call. Etc.

But the internet's online ads? Email spam? Telemarketing? These are forms of advertising that are actively hostile, and they've become the default. So now a user that wants to be on the internet at all is best served by block all ads, including the ones that would've otherwise been reasonable.

Google will never make me feel guilty for blocking ads when they're already making their search engine unusable, too.

[-] Manticore@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago

And while I'm at it, here's the filters to add to your uBlock Origin's MY FILTERS settings to block YT's blocker:

youtube.com##+js(set, yt.config_.openPopupConfig.supportedPopups.adBlockMessageViewModel, false)

youtube.com##+js(set, Object.prototype.adBlocksFound, 0)

youtube.com##+js(set, ytplayer.config.args.raw_player_response.adPlacements, [])

youtube.com##+js(set, Object.prototype.hasAllowedInstreamAd, true)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think it's less enforceable than they think - every system someone sets up will eventually be circumvented.

It'll be a pain for a few months, or we'll see a federated alt pick up creators.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Report issue. You're not running an adblocker! wink What's an adblocker??

Google already has trouble with support, if they have a million lightly befuddled users who are getting blocked and "don't know why", that will be a problem for Google.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Somehow I feel like they won't care, those reports probably go directly into the bin.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
348 points (95.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54029 readers
471 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS