51
Moose, Maple Syrup and Monopolies: Is Canada Finally Taking on Its Oligarchs?
(www.thebignewsletter.com)
no
A fine example of Betteridge's law.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
One nation that is surprisingly interesting in its competition dynamics is Canada, which compared to the U.S. has historically had a much larger state sector but also physically shares our infrastructure, such as railroads and waterways.
In 2022, our competition regulator, a courageous official named Matthew Boswell, diverged from the path taken by his predecessors and challenged one of the most ossified sectors in the Canadian economy, the telecom industry.
The changes to the Competition Act work in concert with the federal government’s steps in response to the power of Big Tech, with bills last year to mandate contributions from technology companies to support Canadian cultural content and our ailing news industry.
While the Liberals eventually approved the transaction, the Conservatives under the leadership of Pierre Poilievre called on the Deputy Prime Minister to block the acquisition of a competitor by the country’s largest financial institution to preserve competition in the mortgage market.
Though these moves can be written off as political posturing, they mark a recent shift in the relationship between policy makers and concentrated corporate power and create the foundation for the kind of real change we are beginning to see in Canada.
Taking a page from the Biden administration, Canada’s government must also understand that there are a wide array of policy tools that can be brought to bear in the fight to rebalance power in our economy.
The original article contains 2,359 words, the summary contains 231 words. Saved 90%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
51 points (96.4% liked)
politics
19096 readers
1159 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS