this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
711 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31852 readers
3278 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nonprophet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Make that One Million and ONE!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That Hakeem guy feels snakelike but is he a snake for good or evil? Maybe it's time for a clean slate going forward. Now is the time.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey, if he can deliver on the mandate Democrats received in this election, and is willing to deliver, and does deliver, then the measure will be in Democrats' ability to mobilize voters again in 2028.

If he can, will, and does do that, then I will happily admit I was wrong about him.

We shall see.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Jeffries is there to ensure Project 2025 doesn't see any opposition from the opposition party.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Shit that was fast!

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

2 things:

  • The person that started the petition gets paid 30 cents for each signature
  • No other candidates are up for the position

Summary: performative nonsense intended to distract the Dems. And it's working.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’m not American so please take that into account, but my perception of the dems is they have a listening problem, both internally and externally. They can’t seem to keep their ears on the ground.

Dems are too beholden to the donor class- the Hollywood crowd- Spielbergs and Streisands and corporatists Dems like Bill & Hillary.

The way politics are financed in the USA perpetuates the need for endless cash grabbing from rich donors. Meanwhile, the common people sit at the back of the bus.

Been that way for decades, now.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's because the establishment wing of the party since Bill Clinton's time has actually been fiscally conservative.

So they don't listen to the people's cries when they beg for progress. Because progressivism here is the closest thing we have to social democracy. And yet they get derided as "far-left" 🙄... Please.

The actual far-left calls even progressives "centrists." But there is no actual far-left in US politics; that only exists among edge lords and keyboard warriors on the fringes of the internet.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bill Clinton removed glass-steagal to add a clear example.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't know that, thanks. Could that have contributed to the 2008 financial crisis?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is mentioned in the wiki entry. It does seem to be a contributing factor

load more comments (1 replies)

he was always just a DEI hire, even on his best day which wasn't all that great a day anyway.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Fuck Jeffries and Schumer, both of those fuckers are selfish assholes who just want to go back to the status quo so they can keep collecting their bribes in peace.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 69 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Fuck Hakeem Jeffries.

I mean, what more needs to be said at this point.

[–] BillionaireStew@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I understand he got the position by being the only person who wanted it.

It might be more productive to name a candidate rather than the more nebulous "anyone but Hakeem Jeffries". Ro Khanna seems like he could do a good job but I have heard no indication that he wants to do the job.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Ro Khanna for Speaker, that I can get behind!

Some more options: Jamie Raskin, Pramila Jayapal, Robert Garcia

Feel free to add to the list, and mention your top choices when you email your representatives to say No to Jeffries

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FWIW, in her victory speach the other day, Jayapal said she’s heading the immigration subcommittee and that there WILL be investigations and people WILL be going to jail. 🥰

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

He represents AIPAC and AIPAC won the majority so I guess it makes sense that he is the speaker of the genocide supporting majority

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yerp, a Schumer/Jeffries leadership would mean more AIPAC-funded status quo and "across the aisle" appeasement/compromise.

When will they learn that there's no compromising with fascism?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They’re not compromising with fascists because they are also fascists. They just think the killing, mass surveillance, genocide, undermining democracy, taking bribes, insider trading, war profiteering, attacks on civil liberties, for profit concentration camps and police militarization should be done more quietly

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And thus, why the only real solution is becoming armed and organized. Either they end up fearing us enough to make changes, or we realize our own power as a populace and make those changes by force.

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I saw that half circle infographic with colored dots showing the distribution of party members, but this one had AIPAC in black dots. Currently there 231 AIPAC seats to 164 independent democrats, 11 independent republicans, and 25 uncalled (idk what that means). It really showed how the real distribution of power is in the House, and why none of the problems are going to get fixed. AIPAC party members control the majority still.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uncalled means they're still counting ballots.

But yeah I've seen that graphic for the previous session but I haven't seen one yet for the next one. Do you mind linking it?

This just tells us what our work is for the next primary season though. We're taking chunks out of the AIPAC biparty. Just need to keep biting off forkfulls until it's enough to make a difference.

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I saved it from a reddit thread.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well when you put it that way...

You know, I've always said we need at least three viable political parties. This is not what I had in mind...

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

The hidden party is not good. But there should be enough independent democrats to kick out Jeffries and Schumer, if the new blood have enough tenacity.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

You ever wonder what would happen if they just started dropping like flies? Because I do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Garfunkel@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The reach of israel in american politics is insane. Forget the fact that tiktok is owned by an israeli billionaire. Zohran endorsed Jefferies and now Mamdani has been acting weird endorsing it and doing nothing when he promised to arrest nethanyahu for his war crimes.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Zohran endorsed Jefferies

Is that true? I can't find any sources on that outside of newsweek and politico. Got anything that isn't a reactionary right-wing rag?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Here is a clip posted by Forbes which has his full, unedited answer to the question, from a few months ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don Lemon referred to him as "AIPAC Shakur" - love it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] f1error@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Signed. These politicians either like the pac's values or they break their own, and either way shows no integrity. Do better!

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›