this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
65 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2778 readers
119 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rhamph@awful.systems 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's a ridiculously simple test you can use to figure out whether AI mandates at a given company are well-considered, or are being shoved out the door by out-of-touch buffoons: What happens when an engineer documents that AI made a task worse? Are they taken seriously, or are they marginalized and eventually managed out?

Even easier test: is it an AI mandate?

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If AI makes a task easier i find that engineers will use it. Engineers are lazy. We want to automate stuff so ee dont have to do it.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago

Engineers are a formally certified thing, you don't get to call yourself an engineer because you make digital machines.

One of the certification requirements is ethical standards and education.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 6 days ago

you're the kind of programmer your colleagues hate having to deal with

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 5 points 6 days ago

This document contains a lot of great stuff. I have a tremendous level of respect, both personal and professional, for Amazon's Principal Engineering community; I'm led to understand that that respect may not be reciprocated, but that's okay. I am, by their standards, a lapsed engineer who ran away to join the circus as one of its lesser clowns.

was there really a need to grovel

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This article reads like it was AI generated.

[–] ebu@awful.systems 1 points 6 days ago