rhamph

joined 1 month ago
[–] rhamph@awful.systems 4 points 4 hours ago

Once again, slop machines only work ‘well’ when you can externalise the pain and costs onto someone else (in this case, millions of stressed-out sysadmins and webmasters)

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Cory casually adopts the latest slopaganda

It's possible for some of the code produced by an LLM to be slop

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago

Technically true, in that it’s the only move he’s ever had

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Just as AI and quantum computing that doesn’t suck is always just a little bit off in the future, data centres that churn through horrendous amounts of water are always a thing of the recent past.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have I misunderstood what they meant by ‘superexponential’? I thought they were doing exp(exp(t)) but I am inferring that it’s somehow even sillier than that?

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dare say that’s why they shouldn’t be confused.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

effective journalists

I have gazed too long into the abyss, and interpreted this as some kind of effective altruist

Effective journalism: always be sure to talk up the billionaire class for the dividends to society these titans of industry yield. Wouldn’t that be crazy.

 

Disney is looking to buy up all the staff and assets of suicide-as-a-service provider Character.AI, conveniently leaving behind its bankrupt husk to cover all the liability in multiple ongoing lawsuits.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not literally an asymptote, but once you presuppose something as farcical as nested exponentials, your model is doomed to blow up immediately after the last data point.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I expected the beneficiary would be some EA outfit, but it’s actually an entirely new company (and not any kind of charity or nonprofit) called the “Anthropic Public Benefit Fund”, which I’m sure will not at all be managed by EAs (and who would definitely not determine that the most effective altruism is sending money to Anthropic).

I like this:

Subject to stockholder approval, 5% of Anthropic’s shares will be committed today, with an additional 2% added at the board’s discretion for every 50% increase in the company’s value above a set baseline.

You like the public benefit, don’t you? Make sure you invest strongly in Anthropic and pump that valuation even higher, because there’s no other way we could choose to offer more support.

Anyway here’s their blog post on the matter, strangely not linked in the article as far as I can tell: https://www.anthropic.com/news/public-benefit-fund

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 12 points 3 days ago (8 children)

That ‘superexponential’ thing annoys me so much. Just the most blatant ‘the line goes up because I really really want it to’, while all their rationalisations for it are just describing exponential behaviour.

We talk about the importance of humanities but it’d be nice if they learnt a bit of maths too.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago

I am saying that the anti-fascist communities ended up […] uninterested in using LLMs

:O

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago

Some descriptors for ‘democratised’ software that people can slop for themselves:

Slop as single-use software
Slop as fast fashion

 

Before AI Doomer Coxon’s ‘hilbertspaess’ account was made this year, an account by that name had previously been created and deleted at least two times prior. And, according to the Internet Archive, the first display name on that account was ‘Jacob Coxon’. So it’s reasonable to say that it was his account then too, and thus its posts are his unfiltered intellect.

Someone on Twitter by the name Dugan Nash put together a dedicated archive of hilbertspaess’s old tweets from the internet archive, hosted at https://hilbertspaess.pages.dev/

The things a rationalist doomer bro was posting on twitter in 2022 might surprise you! If you somehow weren’t expecting to see anything about IQ, the Holocaust, AI, or NFTs.

Via Futurism, via Reddit SneerClub

 

Mozilla once again notices that, in spite of the lavish salaries they heap upon their techbro executives, Firefox’s userbase continues to dwindle. Could this be because they don’t operate a monolithic surveillance advertising racket? Or maybe it’s because the corners in the UI aren’t round enough.

https://www.firefox.com/en-US/whatsnew/157/

Choice quote from that interview, which was important enough to get a big box in the release notes too:

We are bringing back compact mode as well

We removed it for absolutely no goddamn fucking reason, despite numerous objections, and now we’re bringing it back! This is called ‘listening’, you see. We are very dependable can definitely be relied upon to provide a stable browser that you won’t have to worry about.

Somehow those executives just can’t work out that unless you can advertise Firefox in all of the search engines and youtubes and gmails and docs and drives and whatever the fuck and preinstall it on all the phones, the Chrome users will not come. “Ooh shiny” is the least of anyone’s concerns.

 

Good coverage of our friends, their many interconnected networks and less-than-savoury beliefs – no particularly glaring omissions like that ‘sex cult’ thread that was doing the rounds (although its author is cited towards the end).

There are some little factual or phrasing concerns, like saying Aella ‘taught herself statistics’ in any meaningful sense, but overall I think this is a good summary and introduction to the sphere.

I’ve seen this posted or alluded to in a few places; not sure whether it made one of the stubsacks but certainly not yet a top-level sneerpost.

 

It was fine when I was free to foist slop upon my coworkers, but now everyone is returning the favour?? What the hell. This sucks.

Naturally commenters are careful to note that they of course use the chatbot with care and precision, it’s those insidious others taking the easy approach and not having the moral fortitude to apply a little thought

view more: next ›