rhamph

joined 1 month ago
[–] rhamph@awful.systems 2 points 7 hours ago

Plot twist: he just told the chatbot to put in a screen about slop usage, didn’t look at the result, and it dug up a photo portrait from his photos without him noticing

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 3 points 8 hours ago

Big corporations are not in the business of selling things and making profits. Their whole line of business is gaming financial markets.

In that regard, datacentres don’t need to do anything. It just needs to demonstrate some material ‘investment’ into Making AI Happen, presenting a potential for super duper revenues in the glorious future, and thereby securing outlandish valuations today.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 4 points 9 hours ago

Slop foundries solved the “slop is uncopyrightable” problem by making the output so awful that nobody would want to pinch it

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 4 points 2 days ago

Basically the sole silver lining I see in our slopocalypse is that some portion of the fortunes being incinerated is moving money from finance parasites back to actual people. Some of it.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 3 points 2 days ago

If Anthropic’s AI was truly capable of autonomously producing a Photoshop clone, Anthropic would have done it themselves.

Ah, but those margins are chump change for a firm as important as Anthropic. Your proposal will need far more zeros than that (and a minus sign in front).

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I haven’t tried it out in the wild, but I feel that Sex, AI, and the Apocalypse appropriately addresses a lot of noteworthy aspects, even though the title gives so much prominence to ‘sex’.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago

Pray tell, how is the chatbot going to know what you want to say if you won’t write it out? This feels a little too obvious.

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

microdosing (n) – Taking small amounts of illegal drugs while white. It may be possible to microdose without writing a book or personal essay about it, but the evidence suggests otherwise.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/26/how-to-speak-silicon-valley-decoding-tech-bros-from-microdosing-to-privacy

(I don’t remember ‘small amounts of’ in there; somewhat diminishes the joke IMHO)

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago

I think there’s a typo: we have to explore new technologies as they enter the market TO risk being left behind [by our customers].

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 2 points 5 days ago

I thought they already got rid of the corners 🤔

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 6 points 6 days ago

Best of luck to both of you in your searches for cleaner pastures!

[–] rhamph@awful.systems 8 points 6 days ago

Every one deserves a proper look! … but we’ll do slop reviews instead.

 

Before AI Doomer Coxon’s ‘hilbertspaess’ account was made this year, an account by that name had previously been created and deleted at least two times prior. And, according to the Internet Archive, the first display name on that account was ‘Jacob Coxon’. So it’s reasonable to say that it was his account then too, and thus its posts are his unfiltered intellect.

Someone on Twitter by the name Dugan Nash put together a dedicated archive of hilbertspaess’s old tweets from the internet archive, hosted at https://hilbertspaess.pages.dev/

The things a rationalist doomer bro was posting on twitter in 2022 might surprise you! If you somehow weren’t expecting to see anything about IQ, the Holocaust, AI, or NFTs.

Via Futurism, via Reddit SneerClub

 

Mozilla once again notices that, in spite of the lavish salaries they heap upon their techbro executives, Firefox’s userbase continues to dwindle. Could this be because they don’t operate a monolithic surveillance advertising racket? Or maybe it’s because the corners in the UI aren’t round enough.

https://www.firefox.com/en-US/whatsnew/157/

Choice quote from that interview, which was important enough to get a big box in the release notes too:

We are bringing back compact mode as well

We removed it for absolutely no goddamn fucking reason, despite numerous objections, and now we’re bringing it back! This is called ‘listening’, you see. We are very dependable can definitely be relied upon to provide a stable browser that you won’t have to worry about.

Somehow those executives just can’t work out that unless you can advertise Firefox in all of the search engines and youtubes and gmails and docs and drives and whatever the fuck and preinstall it on all the phones, the Chrome users will not come. “Ooh shiny” is the least of anyone’s concerns.

 

Good coverage of our friends, their many interconnected networks and less-than-savoury beliefs – no particularly glaring omissions like that ‘sex cult’ thread that was doing the rounds (although its author is cited towards the end).

There are some little factual or phrasing concerns, like saying Aella ‘taught herself statistics’ in any meaningful sense, but overall I think this is a good summary and introduction to the sphere.

I’ve seen this posted or alluded to in a few places; not sure whether it made one of the stubsacks but certainly not yet a top-level sneerpost.

 

It was fine when I was free to foist slop upon my coworkers, but now everyone is returning the favour?? What the hell. This sucks.

Naturally commenters are careful to note that they of course use the chatbot with care and precision, it’s those insidious others taking the easy approach and not having the moral fortitude to apply a little thought

view more: next ›