this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
69 points (84.2% liked)

Linux

68350 readers
124 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite how this may feel, this post really is about Linux.

Lately I've been thinking a lot about trying to daily drive ... something else. OpenBSD. RedoxOS. 9front, Plan9. Heck, MINIX3. Some of it is that I've always wanted to try living on a micro-kernel, as I strongly agree with the design principles; but more recently a lot of it is because of what's going on in both user space and the Linux kernel. I can escape from systemd by running Artix or Void or a dozen other anti-systemd distributions; Wayland is getting harder to avoid and some people no longer have a choice despite Wayland still trailing X in accessibility. But that's still fine for me since my preferred window manager doesn't run on Wayland at all, and there are no efforts to port it. Most alarming is what feels like a slippery slope around AI in the Linux kernel. No amount of distribution dodging is going to avoid that.

So I spend more and more time looking at alternatives and evaluating if I really can daily drive something other than Linux. Today I realized that I've trapped myself, and that trap is because of games.

I'm not a huge gamer, but I like to occasionally play; and recently, Linux has been really really great for games, even beating Windows on its home turf. I played entirely through Borderlands 4 on Linux -- a game which is demanding of hardware, by any measure -- on what's basically a mobile AMD CPU/GPU and it crashed all of twice the entire game. I waste a few hours every month on Factorio. I've got stuff bookmarked in my Steam library that I know run well on Linux; we have resources like the ProtonDB. Lately, this has been my big blocker, and that realization I mentioned was in the form of realizing that I'm using the exact same excuse Windows users used to use to avoid switching to Linux. Because they didn't want to lose access to games.

Something that's informing my hesitation is that I have a Linux phone, too. It's got an arm64 CPU, and is running some mobil-ized fork of Debian, and so much software isn't available for it. So. Much. Either there aren't packages for the OS and they're not in Flathub; or they are in Flathub but they're not adaptive and so are effectively useless on a mobile device; or they're in Flathub but aren't available to arm64; or they're in Flathub but just don't run because 30% of Flatpaks in Flathub are broken and don't run -- at least, they don't run on my phone, because they don't like whatever's providing GL via Wayland. What this experience has done is made me pessemistic about jumping platforms: if I lose access to half the software I use just by switching CPU architectures, how bad will it be if I up and out change kernels? Pretty bad, I'm expecting; I'm not going to be playing any AAA games, that's for sure. Which is why -- even though Linus himself is slop-coding patches into the kernel -- I feel trapped.

It's incredible that Linux has come so far on the desktop that the availability of games is a blocking factor to migrating off of it -- isn't it? C'mon old timers: we've come so very far, baby, and for most of it I never imagined we'd be here. We've already taken over the world, via phones, via servers, via infrastructure, via all that FOSS that corporations are furtively using illegally by not following the LICENSEs of the libraries upon which their platforms are built. We've won, although desktop users only dimly, if at all, comprehend it; we give ourselves handicaps to ensure we remain the outsider underdog, by using increasingly more constrained sub-markets as our penetration measure.

Maybe it's inevitable: popularity increases capability which begets stickiness. I like being able to just fire up Factorio, not having to dual boot, or faff around with virtual machines or with maintaining two ecosystems. Heck, I don't even have to run Steam -- there's a Factorio: Space Age package in AUR. I just launch it from the command line. I'm going to lose all that by going to RedoxOS. Sure, I'll gain the confidence that the kernel isn't being written by an RNG, but what am I willing to give up? Games?

In a way, Linux has achieved Windows-ness. It's sticky. People have to stay, unless they're willing to accept the austerity measures of a younger (or at least far less popular) OS. The excuses Windows users made, now Linux users are making. I want to move to a better OS... bUt WhAt AbOuT mUh GaMeS?!?!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I genuinely don't understand the hate SystemD gets and especially not Wayland. SystemD is fantastic for sysops and while I've always liked it, I've really started to like it since moving to podman from docker. I get the concerns for how much it handles but Linux and SystemD are still both OSS so if something happens, someone will fork it or someone will make an alternative

For Wayland, just why? I've used Linux for two decades and Wayland is just so much better than X11. X11 is an ancient codebase with decades of tech debt and half realised features and it shows. Trying to get monitor independent fractional scaling on X11 was just impossible

The hate for both just screams "its popular so I don't like it" to me

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I genuinely don’t understand the hate SystemD gets

I wrote a post that's really too long to copy/paste here and would be off-topic anyway. I can't speak for anyone else, but those are my reasons.

My favorite alternative at the moment is dinit. Thankfully, it's one of the ones Artix supports, so it's pretty easy to switch.

especially not Wayland

That's pretty simple, for me: X works, Wayland doesn't. That is, X does everything I want it to, and every time I try Wayland, probably once a year, it fails to do something basic. The last time, I couldn't get fonts to render properly -- the bar fonts were all out of wack with the rest of the desktop. Changing the DPI would cause application fonts to get bigger and the bar fonts to get smaller, or vice-versa; I don't remember exactly. I do remember fighting with it for a couple hours and then going back to X, where everything just worked™. That was sometime in March. Maybe it's fixed by now; I'll try again next year.

The hate for both just screams “its popular so I don’t like it” to me

Huh. Well, I tried to put reasonably objective arguments in the systemd blog entry; I didn't document my various ventures into trying to get global keybindings working with Wayland, or a decent screen saver, or to get DPI working properly, so all I can present is anecdotal evidence. Which isn't worth much if you've had a good experience with it.

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I agree with most of what you are saying and am also looking for an excuse to switch to a BSD. BUT:


Re: Wayland

It doesn't sound "hard to refuse" at all, unless you are also sticking with the big two DEs and no forks. For context I have done both X11 and Wayland installations based purely on whichever runs better on any given machine with some tweaking. Wayland runs amazing on new 3D-only GPUs, which is what it was designed around. Although I don't have any bar at all, I just use sway with the bar removed because that's what I'm used to. And because all bars I could find either aren't maintained anymore, suck at efficiency or suck at running without a bunch of config file editing. Which is kind of a fault of the time frame when Wayland was popularized and the leadership for adjacent standards rather than the original protocol design. And it's also not a fault of the base protocol that virtually all implementations ended up using lots of "Linuxisms" like libinput which require all sorts of weird hacks to run on other systems. Maybe in the near future this will be better considering the whole Linux "left opposition" situation replaying in the age of LLMs.

Re: Linux phones

They suck because it's an extremely niche category of people who can port, consider Android too bad and yet don't consider most of the devices themselves bad. They are amazing from recycling and pocket computing standpoints, but there are even less people thinking this rationally about it, unfortunately.

Also, "available in OS but not Flathub" that's a good thing, no? You are also in an extremely niche category of people who are anti-systemd, anti-Wayland yet pro-Flatpak.

Re: RedoxOS

Was it the Rust one? If so, "not written by an RNG machine" makes little sense given that Rust tooling itself is tainted.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Wayland

It doesn't sound "hard to refuse" at all, unless you are also sticking with the big two DEs and no forks

This is what I was referring to: I've seen a comment from someone who needed KDE's accessability features, some of which didn't work under X.

I'm not worried about it for myself; I use tiling WMs and in particular one which won't be ported to Wayland (unless its forked). I thought I mentioned that.

Flatpak

You are also in an extremely niche category of people who are anti-systemd, anti-Wayland yet pro-Flatpak.

Hey, no need to be insulting. I'm absolutely not pro-Flatpak. I have no choice on the phone, which is running a distro tuned for the hardware (limiting my ability to install a different distro and still have the hardware work) and Flatpak is how it distributes programs. Almost nothing is available via apt, and a lot of upstream projects do not provide assets except for Flatpak ones. Compiling software on the phone is possible, sometimes, but it's pretty heavy to get all the various toolchains for various projects, for a device with constrained storage and memory.

I do not use Flatpak anywhere but this phone, and I have no choice not to.

Flatpak is the source of most of the issues I encounter trying to run stuff; it's annoying enough that I didn't have an opinion about Flatpak but now resent it.

RedoxOS

given that Rust tooling itself is tainted

Perfect is the enemy of good. If I can't avoid eating dogshit, I can at least reduce the amount.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kajika@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your post was nice and well written, was it shared somewhere?

I long for something different than hacker "fascist" news and their AI-filled website.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thank you! No, I mostly write my blog for my own mental health - screaming into the void, as it were.

[–] Kajika@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Can I suggest?

  • Fix publish date : it is written Jul 30, 2025
  • Add prefers-color-scheme
  • if you use css variables (cutsom.css -> :root) might as well not hard code background-color and color in body.
[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I think the date is just using Go's standard format; I didn't change it. But you're right, of course: it should be RFC3339 or ISO8601.

Honestly, I'll accept any suggestions. I'm not a web developer and my CSS-knowledge is really sketchy. I cribbed the basic Tufte format from a Hugo template and probably mangled the CSS in all sorts of ways in the process of getting it to look like I wanted. I wouldn't look at the HTML, though; I know the static site generator code has bugs, and the templates probably do too.

But I'll include those changes -- thanks again.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (4 children)

comparing Linux to Windows is hilarious.

let me introduce you to Richard Stallman, the OG Linux hater. the author and advocate for GPLv3 thought Linux was too corporate, too compromising to corporate interests.

this world of technology is about compromise. life itself is about compromise. if you want to create your own OS, your own programming language, your own set of standards, go ahead. no one is stopping you.

except, you don’t actually want that. you want text editors, browsers, email, and video games. those things depend on standards, and those standards are shared by other interests, whether you like them or agree with them or are morally aligned with them or not. that’s the sacrifice we make to fly on an airplane or drive a car on public roads or use publicly created software.

look into Free Open Source Software. not OSS, FOSS. there’s a difference. you should be cognizant of the tradeoffs.

heck maybe read some Marx/Engels.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bushvin@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So, you built your own walled garden. Congrats.

I’m guessing at some point you will disagree with decisions made in BSD. Then what?

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not going to apologize for having standards and morals.

Yah, if BSD starts funneling donations to Omarchy, or they decide to accept cryptographic PRs from the NSA, or they start bundling crypto-mining code in the kernel, or if they start implementing parts of the kernel in Javascript, then I'll have to move on again.

Despite your comment, I would be surprised if you didn't have your own boundaries, your own lines which you would not cross.

[–] bushvin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

Despite your comment, I would be surprised if you didn't have your own boundaries, your own lines which you would not cross.

Of course I do. And when provided good arguments, I redraw my boundaries. Like any reasonable being. Right? Am I happy with all choices made for me by upstream projects?

No.

But at some level they make sense.

If I want roses, I’ll have to take the thorns with it, because having roses makes me happy. Avoiding them (because I hate thorns) makes me sad.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 4 points 5 days ago

And, probably, if Linux were all there was besides Windows and OSX I'd just be raging against the wind. My whole and only original point was that there are alternatives, and advocates thereof who are in a very similar position Linux users were 15 years ago: a minority of users who, for various reasons, have chosen to not use the 800lb gorilla. And some Linux users are now in the position Windows users were back then, where they feel they can't switch without giving up too much.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

If thorns are a dealbreaker, there is no shortage of flowers without them. Indluding rose varieties.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago

Yeah OP, how dare you having convictions and acting according to them.

[–] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I've been daily using Linux for more than 13 years at this point but I too am concerned at the direction some things are going in. I'm on Artix and happy there for the time being. But I definitely have started keeping an eye on BSD so its always in my back pocket if the need arises. We now have a laptop with GhostBSD on it so we can get and stay familiarised with it. But our biggest issue at the moment is gaming and Steam (yes, I could not use Steam but I'm happy with it and like using it).

It feels like it sucks so much that finally after years of encouraging others to switch to Linux that its finally starting to become more mainstream but its right at a time when mega corps are also sinking their claws in so deeply that its finally having a really negative effect on the ecosystem (their claws have been in for years but the community has mostly kept them at bay, apart from freaking systemd, for the most part up until now).

Also depressing that people are uneducated on the long controversial history of corporations sticking their greedy noses into the FOSS space to the detriment of all, and not understanding why this stuff is so very important for the future of Linux and FOSS generally.

[–] AmbiguousCabbage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Genuine question, what negative effects are corps having on the Linux ecosystem? I've also been daily driving Linux for over a decade and it honestly feels pretty similar now to how it did 10 years ago.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

I dunno, probably funding the majority of engineers that work on key components of the system.

In my experience having maintainers who are paid means they have time to do the long term work on improving the projects.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 5 points 5 days ago

I wasn't as concerned about corporate contributions; Linux seemed pretty immune to the sorts of shenanigans corpo money affected Firefox with, and with the kernel maintainers and Linus reviewing patches, chances for stuff to slip past them, I felt, was slim. It's the very fact that the core team is leaning on AI more which is undermining that confidence; I'm not competent to review everything that goes into the kernel myself, so I have to trust the maintainers.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

FreeBSD has the Linux emulation layer and some people seem to have good luck running steam through that. I have not tried, but I think it's the most realistic for an OS that isn't windows or Linux that can play gams.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is off-topic, but: my first Lemmy account, which is a year or two older than this one, is on midwest.social. I think you're the first midwest.social account I've noticed "in the wild" from this Piefed account. I've probably seen more but just not consciously recognized them. Anyway: howdy!

Even if I don't end up on FreeBSD (I was eyeballing OpenBSD), I may try it just to see if I can get Factorio running on it.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's dozens of us!

I'm far from a BSD expert but how is the GPU support in OpenBSD these days? Last I checked things looked kinda grim.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I have no idea; I haven't made time to try live-USB-booting the various options yet; I might not get a chance until after the holidays.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myszka@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for NixOS to become independent from the kernel (projects which use other kernels already exist) so that all software just kind of automatically gets ported to whatever OS I end up using. Imagine choosing another kernel in the bootloader and then getting the exact same ecosystem that you've tuned for yourself but on an entirely different OS!

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Now, that would be a believable and compelling selling point for declarative OSes. I'm not fond of them as a rule (but not on any technical basis, just preference) but if you could toggle a setting and get a different kernel and corresponding user space, that would be cool.

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I use Guix with the latest Linux kernel via nonguix and love it. The GNU Hurd kernel is always there though!

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you tried Hurd? Guix should make it easy to try, right?

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 2 points 3 days ago

They're still in the early days. The thinkpad x60 writeup, for example, walks through reviving some network drivers.

In my experience though the declarative build system acts as a ratchet. No golden bash history so you recall all the steps. Basically no "works on my machine". The community is pretty great too. I'd recommend giving it a look. The Linux-Libre kernel may also be a good fit for your needs (default for Guix).

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What don't you like about them? I personally find Nix to be suuuuuper handy once you get the hang of it, and I love that I can just back up my configs to get most of the system back. It is kinda annoying how its deviation from POSIX compliance breaks and complicates things, though.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Given I've recently been ranting about systemd and Wayland, I want to be clear I don't think there's a problem with immutable distros; I just don't like using them. It's preference, and I could easily switch opinions.

I don't like having to recompile my OS. I like config files in /etc; adding another layer of indirection, and having to deal with another non-trivial bespoke declarative language, add several lines to a file, and recompile my environment just to do simple things like add a single line host to /etc/hosts is too much indirection for me.

I'm sincere: I don't object to immutable OSes. I think they're a good idea; I'm just waiting for some smart person to make one that I like more. I tried to package something for Nix once, and it was way harder than I thought it should have been - far harder than writing a package for Arch, or Artix, or Void. And the package repos - the definitions, not the packages themselves - took up a gigabyte (or something like that) of space, which felt absurb. And Guix is Lisp, which I have a lot of respect for, but hate having to deal with.

Anyway, I have no technical objections to Nix or Guix, they're jyst not for me. Someone will come up with another flavor, and maybe I'll like it. Maybe a layer on top of Artix, or something.

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Still got a ways to come, but you should check out Haiku. It's a community developed spiritual successor to BeOS. I will admit that not everything will run on there, and the hardware support isn't the most wide ranging (but gets all of its drivers from OpenBSD and FreeBSD), but it's easy to use, runs and installs extremely quickly, and all the developers are super passionate about it. I think it can run Minecraft, not sure about other games and it recently got Firefox too

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pmtriste@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I just saw this post about wine on OpenBsd so maybe you aren't as stuck as you think.

https://lemdro.id/post/47533813

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's funny cause i was having similar thoughts recently, and pretty much came to the same conclusion, except for me it's not just gaming. I'm using Guix now and have used NixOS in the past, and i really came to love declaring my entire system through a configuration file, i just love how organized it feels and being able to easily reinstall a very customized system. As far as i'm aware such a thing doesn't really exist on BSD. I think i read about the Nix package manager having some experimental support for FreeBSD, but it's not the same as declaring the whole system, so i would have to give that up. It probably wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, since i also really love Void and its simplicity, so BSD probably wouldn't be too drastic of a move, but then there's the gaming aspect, and also, i'm not sure how great hardware support is. I'm not sure about NetBSD, but if i understand correctly, both FreeBSD and OpenBSD port their amdgpu drivers over from Linux, so up until pretty recent AMD cards should be supported depending on the release. AMD processors should also be good to go, so i'm guessing it comes down to wifi as a potential blocker maybe.

Something else i've been thinking about is: does it really matter at the end of the day? Because code submitted to the kernel is still held to the same standard whether it was created with the help of an LLM or not. Not only that, but on the BSD side of things, even when they are explicitly anti-AI, if someone submits code that was made with the help of an LLM, and the maintainers are not aware of it, but merge it because the quality of the code is good, wouldn't it put them in the exact same situation as Linux? The only difference at that point would be that one of them is openly saying they accept it, and the other does not, but in reality basically the same thing happens either way. So i feel like at that point i would only be switching for an ideological difference that can't really hold up practically, so what's the point?

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

so BSD probably wouldn't be too drastic of a move, but then there's the gaming aspect,

I tried out FreeBSD probably close to ten years ago now, and there was a compatibility tool for Linux software. I didn't run it super long, but the gaming experience I had wasn't very different from the one I had on Linux. Of course, ten years ago, we expected more breakage playing on Linux, so it's possible I had more errors than I'd have gotten on Linux and just didn't realize it, in which case, it couldn't be that much worse.

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I've only been using linux for 5 years now, but yeah i think gaming even on linux was very different ten years ago. Valve and their Proton fork of Wine have made a ton of games perfectly playable, aside from the kernel level anti-cheat games. Some of that progress does seem like it has bled over to FreeBSD, and you can play more and more games there too, but from what i've read/seen the catalog of games that work is smaller on FreeBSD, but i guess it depends on what you're happy with. I think i saw most emulators are available on FreeBSD too, and OpenBSD recently got its own Wine port.

[–] myszka@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Check out NixBSD. It's like NixOS, but with FreeBSD or OpenBSD kernel instead of Linux. Not sure how usable it is atm though.

Also there's Astarinas NixOS. Asterinas is a new Linux abi compatible kernel written in Rust. It is in early development but surely is a promising project.

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Ah, i think i've actually read about NixBSD before, but forgot about it. Haven't heard of Astarina though. I'll have to keep an eye on these projects!

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you're using Guix... doesn't Guix have a version that uses Hurd? It's not BSD, but it's also not Linux. Hurd is one option I'm looking at.

does it really matter at the end of the day?

Yeah, I don't know. Maybe not. I guess it's a question of whether my trust in the core Linux maintainers' development skill translates to trust in their ability to use AI well. There's pretty good evidence of Dunning-Kruger-like effect where developers over-estimate how good LLM-generated code is, and whether it makes them more productive; is Linus immune to that? I guess I don't want to get caught with my pants down, and that means not having to scramble if the front falls off the boat.

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah they do support Hurd! Though i think hardware support is much worse there than it is on BSD and also still marked as experimental. I'm thinking of trying it out in a vm at some point. Regarding the LLM stuff i feel the same way, and even if i'm not planning to switch away anytime soon, i am still looking at BSD content out of curiousity and to also familiarize myself with it if i ever feel like Linux gets to a state where i have to jump ship.

This actually reminds me though. A while back i read an article about how Debian used to have a variant of their distro that used the GNU coreutils combined with the FreeBSD kernel. They don't support it anymore, but i'm curious if we might see these types of distros pop up again now that more and more people have concerns about the Linux kernel. I don't know how hard it is to combine those two, but it would be awesome if you could run the FreeBSD kernel with Guix for example. That way you still get to have a declarative system too.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If replying very briefly, I think we all need to bury Windows, to make Linux the default, whatever that default is. And then, some of us may migrate to, say, FreeBSD or others. As someone mentioned already, I think the most viable way is FreeBSD, if you want to run games. I’ve read OpenBSD being too slow, since they prioritise security over performance. So, for games, that’s a no-go.

Me, I have no issues with most things Linux. Systemd is convenient, whatever that is. I have never relied on complex X setups. I came to very shallow understanding of it somewhat recently, and I am long with Wayland already (Sway). I don’t like the bloat, but my current Arch Linux setup is close to what I want. I may prefer Gentoo, but I have no knowledge for it, and resources to acquire the knowledge.

If I am to migrate one day, I think FreeBSD is close to what I want. But I don’t know it first hand, and I’m not sure my hardware well supported. Maybe it is. Maybe it’s not. So far, all rings considered, I’m very happy with Linux. As someone who came from a decade of macOS. I haven’t even seen Windows properly since 7. The 10 was a joke, and now 11… I have no name for it, worse than that.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I’ve read OpenBSD being too slow, since they prioritise security over performance

I suspect all of my alternatives are going to be this in one way or another. Microkernels may have improved as people figure out ways to optimize message passing, but it's not going to compete with sharing memory.

I have never relied on complex X setups

I don't think I've touched an X config in over a decade -- what's a "complex X setup"?

The *BSDs are good, established kit, but my concerns about hardware are the same. I think another limiting factor is muscle memory. If I switched whole-hog to BSD, it'd be one thing, but trying to run Linux on some machines and *BSD on others is going to trip me up on the daily because I rely so much on muscle memory. I lost my ability to touch-type with any speed on QWERTY pretty quickly after I switched to Dvorak. My brain isn't contextually modal like that.

Personally, I like diversity. Monopolies are bad. I think Windows existing is fine, because some people genuinely like it and they should have the option of using it if they want to. Same with OSX, Android, iOS, whatever; choice is good. I don't like being forced to use something, whether it's systemd, Wayland, Windows, or LLMs. Some things in life you just have to accept, but there's no excuse for it to be that way in software.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dropdrip@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Computers are literally garbage; there's so many of them. Get another and use it for 9front. Get another and use if for OpenBSD. These other software projects aren't immune to AI or whatever this thread is about... video-games are garbage too. Go outside.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 4 points 6 days ago

These other software projects aren’t immune to AI

Some have a published stance against AI contributions; as long as they maintain and attempt to enforce it, it's good enough. And when AI improves enough that I personally see evidence that improves my opinion of its code quality, I'll change my stance.

Go outside.

Naw. It's 5am and dark out.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You might be more comfortable in Gentoo as you have more choice.

It's interesting how things are coalescing compared to the controlled chaos of the past. I get your feeling, and I feel it too.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›