Linux

2354 readers

2 users here now

Shit, just linux.

Use this community for anything related to linux for now, if it gets too huge maybe there will be some sort of meme/gaming/shitpost spinoff. Currently though… go nuts

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

carrot@sh.itjust.works

Suggestions for WM/DE (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 10 months ago by hellfire103@sopuli.xyz to c/linux@sh.itjust.works

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm going to be doing a clean install of Arch Linux on an old ThinkPad tomorrow morning, and I'd like some suggestions for a window manager, desktop environment, or Wayland compositor.

It can have a learning curve, but I would like it to not have too steep a learning curve (I have been using i3 for a while, and I have just come from LeftWM which I configured to have i3 keybinds). Also, in order to make it fairly obvious to my peers that I'm using Linux, I'd like it to look nothing like Windows or macOS.

Preferably something light (at least out of the box). When I was using LeftWM, my RAM usage was often around 200MB. I recently did a system analysis and I have 8GB of RAM, but my CPU will hold me back. It's an Intel Core 2 Duo of the Penryn microarchitecture (x86_64-v1).

Any suggestions?

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] the_postminimalist@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The information you gave is vague enough that basically any WM or compositor fits the bill.

Do you have a preference between X or Wayland? Do you want something that looks fancy like Hyprland? Is there something in particular that i3 doesn't provide that you might want?

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I prefer X11, and Hyprland doesn't have a great community (apparently). However, I was hoping more that Lemmy would just comment their favourite light WMs to make it easier for me to choose.

[–] the_postminimalist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In that case, my favourite so far is River. Honestly what I like the most about it is that the creator seems like a nice guy, and I liked the talks he gave about the process of making a wayland compositor.

Otherwise, there wasn't much difference between River and something like Sway. Sway had more documentation, and I could also use i3 documentation when needed. But I felt like sticking through figuring out River's config file, and then it was just like any other compositor. And I liked it.

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

I'll give it a go!

[–] WalrusByte@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I've been using Sway and it's good. It's basically i3 but for Wayland.

I also like dwm, but it probably doesn't qualify for the learning curve part. It's not too bad as long as you can read C code and know how to compile things from source.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

how about LXQt?

last I remember it's officially supported by Arch Linux as one of it's DEs, and it's lightweight

I think they also announced plans for Wayland support but that's probably far off into the future