It's almost like Marx was describing the social instability that was already present in his era of capitalism and will always be present because the contradiction between the capitalist's and worker's interest in the means of production cannot be resolved without total annihilation of the unnecessary capitalist class. Suppress it and it will always come back.
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
222 points (100.0% liked)
news
24907 readers
467 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
What are you talking about, bro? Get that money up, not your funni up!!! Haha! Stop worrying about it. 
Nah, that can't be it haha dw about it
first time im hearing abt the sol encampment, does anyone have any articles or smth
fuckin nice.. hadn't heard about this either
I wonder what other texts are searched more. I find it a little annoying how the Manifesto is "the" pamphlet for someone interested in communism to read, though of course I think it's much, much better to read that than to read nothing from Marxism.
What's a better pamphlet to recommend to interested people? I agree that the Manifesto is very caught in the discourse of its time.
I like Why Socialism? by Einstein.
Engels' Principles of Communism is a better introductory summary of Marx and Engel's work, written when they were older and more experienced.
This is kind of a silly answer but I really like Lenin's A Liberal Professor on Equality, and I've used it to successfully explain a very American misunderstanding about the values of socialism.
Really, the best thing that you can do is just talk to people yourself, and the next best thing us to try to tailor your recommendations to their interests and level of enthusiasm. I don't hate the Manifesto or anything.
I personally also might try picking out parts of a text, like from Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, which is just my personal favorite of Marxist writing and a large reason that I'm a Marxist.
I apologize if this isn't helpful. I think some of the recommendations other people gave are also good, though personally I think Principles of Communism is iffy because catechisms are infamously prone to being a little tedious. Still, for some people it is a good recommendation.
Why Socialism is great, I think the answer is subjective to who and where though. Like if you're a teacher I would say Pedagogy of the Oppressed and not any pamphlet.
Do you think Pedagogy isn't too dense? I admire Freire but I think the book might be difficult to parse.
Like I said: "if you are a teacher".
Do you mean that you're teaching it to them? Sorry, I guess I misunderstood what you meant before.
Einstein was a broad progressive in today's terms.
To me, it's The Wretched of the Earth and Wage Labor and Capital.
People here could gang on me for that, but also Capital in the Twenty-First Century (it's a SocDem take but the analysis is good) and Cannibal Capitalism.
Einstein was a broad progressive in today's terms.
I'm not particularly sure "broad progressive" is accurate. The man defended Stalin's purges and trials so he would be called a hardcore tankie by any "broad progressive" today.
Capital in the 21st century radicalized me from progressive to socdem (later r/cth would radicalize me further). I wouldn't call it a good primer or pamphlet due to its length though
That's true. I wasn't really thinking about pamphlets.
I think it remains a very well written pamphlet, written precisely for someone interested in communism. The opening paragraphs are excellent. The later sections about concrete proposals, yeah those are dated, but that’s not til after the evergreen parts.
People curious about communism need to be informed of two facts, firstly class society, secondly the historical fact of class society. Those points also haven’t changed so… I don’t think it needs to be modernized.
I definitely think there's real merit to the Manifesto, but because the latter part is mainly talking about an old program that I think even Marx and Engels decided had some shortcomings, I think it might not be the best for directing the reader's energy productively. Idk, it's not terrible, it's still a good thing to read, I just think it's overrepresented is all.
5,000 percent compared to what? 5 ---> 255 is a 5,000% increase. But it would still be 255 people. I clicked the link but its not in English.
Unfortunately the commie manifesto is a bit outdated in its topics. Fortunately Eurocommunists will love it because they love difficult smart-sounding shit