why is this article being so vague about the actual quotes?
Newsweek’s reporters and editors used Martyn, our AI assistant, to produce this story.
oh.
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
68 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
939 readers
378 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Carlson is a Fascist. Capital F. He is not just a reactionary. He is a well read, intellectual student of Mussolini. But he became that by being a massive fucking nerd, which has stymied his attempts to be the new Reich's thought leader.
It's wild to see someone recognize that German Nazi Fascism and British Empire Fascism are interchangeable, but the takeaway is that it's all good in the hood
Their exchanges also covered the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which Rees-Mogg called “unquestionably justified,” as well as NATO, immigration and free speech.
lol fuck off you piece of shit
He also invoked Nazi Germany for the sake of a "Putin is Hitler" argument
He is a smart enough Fascist to know that all the pomp and circumstance and scapegoating is just set dressing for the defense of capital, but also indifferent and possibly uncharismatic enough to not know that you don't say that shit outloud to the hogs, because they don't want to actually hear that they are just tools of capital.
Nazi defending the third reich is a fork found in kitchen moment.
this just keeps getting worse
What happened to right unity smh