this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

43366 readers
202 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BRUSSELS — The European Commission has rolled out an alternative to Microsoft Teams — but officials using it aren't impressed, with one describing the tool as “absolute shit.”

The Commission introduced Element Pro over the summer as a “sovereign back-up to Teams,” according to an internal staff memo seen by POLITICO. The platform is intended to provide a fallback for Commission communications if U.S.-based Teams becomes unavailable.

While Teams remains the Commission’s main communications tool, Element Pro is an “internal back-up ... that helps ensure our business continuity” in the event of a “disruption,” the memo says.

But three officials have questioned why the Commission needs the new system — and whether it works well enough to serve as a genuine backup.

“I don’t understand the added value here,” one official wrote on an internal staff message board, seen by POLITICO. Another described the tool as “absolute shit.”

A third official said that, judging matters on how well Element Pro works compared to Teams, the U.S. would “instantly win the war” if it ever decided to switch off its technology. All the officials were granted anonymity to speak freely.

The rollout comes as the Commission seeks to reduce its reliance on U.S. technology amid a broader push for European “digital sovereignty.”

“In recent months, digital sovereignty has become increasingly important,” the Commission told staff in a July memo. “In practice, this means having greater control over our data and systems so that we can reduce risks and limit disruption to our work, wherever possible.”

The Commission hosts the Element system on its own infrastructure rather than relying on Microsoft’s cloud. That gives the institution greater control over its communications data and systems.

“That is not the case with Teams, where all we have is a guarantee that Microslop will not peek inside,” a fourth official wrote, presumably referring to Microsoft, in internal communications viewed by POLITICO.

Element is a U.K. company whose software is used by governments and public-sector organizations in Europe. The application works much like Teams, allowing staff to hold “audio and video calls with Commission colleagues, send and receive files, and create dedicated ‘rooms’ for projects and conversations, much like chats and channels in M365 Teams,” according to the Commission memo.

The Commission is not alone in reducing reliance on U.S. technology. Earlier this year, France announced that millions of civil servants will stop using American video-conferencing tools, including Microsoft Teams and Zoom, by 2027 and switch to a homegrown alternative. Austria's military also replaced Microsoft Office with the German-made LibreOffice last year. The Commission hosts the Element system on its own infrastructure rather than relying on Microsoft’s cloud. | Nicolas Tucat/AFP via Getty Images

Element CEO Matthew Hodgson told POLITICO in a call using Element software that the Commission is still trialing it.

“Obviously there are going to be some teething issues,” he said, adding there will always be “cognitive dissonance” when switching to a new app, if only because the “buttons” are in a different place. He noted that the United Nations and NATO also use Element Pro.

“Change is always painful, particularly if it's a switch from a much-used program like Teams,” he said, adding that Element was supporting the EU throughout the rollout and wanted to hear all feedback, good or bad.

The Commission asked Element not to share certain details with POLITICO regarding its subscription to the software, a spokesperson for the company said.

The Commission did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

The people who are likely to benefit off of dependence on US monopoly, pretend they don't like the alternatives.

It's opensource and a lot of it can be change and customized to suite their needs, if they want. Discrediting it as "absolute shit" without any constructive criticism says a lot about where their allegiance lies.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 13 hours ago

Wish they'd say what was shit about it. Been using Element X as a backup client for years, now - while I'm annoyed at how barebones it is, I always felt it worked quite well for people just trying to get communications going in a basic fashion (E.g. To replace WhatsApp).

[–] Guiorgy@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

Just how bad is it that even the hot trash that Teams is is considered better 😂

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don’t understand the added value here

Hmmmm, well, you see ...

the U.S. would “instantly win the war” if it ever decided to switch off its technology [(Referring in part to Microsoft Teams)]

That is the added value--you have a backup. Okay, it's bad? and now you have time to refine before you are forced to figure something out.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 1 day ago

Same vibes as an addict going one day without their substance. “Day one was miserable, so I don’t see the point in sobriety.”

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

If it’s absolute shit, it already sounds like it works better than Teams

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I had a cursory look on Element's website - lots of 'digital sovereignty' marketing blurb and stock imagery but very little in the way of screenshots.

You'd want the software to sell itself, not be hidden away behind mountains of garbage/filler marketing drivel.

[–] CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds pretty consistent with my experience with the current Matrix/Element product. The protocol has a lot of promise, but it’s missing a lot of features still, and the user experience is hot garbage.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, nothing quite like visiting a channel for the first time in a few weeks, while your client spends minutes trying to load the data to actually catch up with what you missed.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

Nextcloud Talk would have been a better candidate