this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
8 points (83.3% liked)

AskHistorians

1470 readers
13 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.

Be sure to check out our partner community at: !askscience@lemmy.world !ireland@lemmy.world !dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world !canada@lemmy.ca !world@lemmy.world


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No grandstanding or pushing of any agenda.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In chronological order of control:

  • Roman Empire/Byzantium
  • Sassanid Empire
  • Umayyad Caliphate
  • Abbasid Caliphat
  • Fatimid Caliphat
  • Seljuk Empire
  • Crusaders and Mameluks
  • Ottoman Empire
  • United Kingdom
  • Israel/Palestine

So basically constant Muslim controlled territory until the UK came in

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But what was the average person's life like?

[–] Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

You should read Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History by Nur Masalha

https://www.palestinechronicle.com/palestine-a-four-thousand-year-history-book-review/

[–] Chl0r0f0rm_Angel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also curious of this. Seems like one of those topics where every point of view is going to want to paint a motivated picture but I want to see life there as it was.

UK had domain over them like India, didn't they?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 days ago

The UK did, but Palestine was different than the more extractive treatment of India.

The British basically picked Jews as the minority to give power to but were far more hands off. Zionist groups used the time and power to immigrate to Israel and establish themselves as the dominant ethnic group. When the British left, Zionist Jews were able to solidify their holdings by having a well trained and supplied army.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago

It was a colonial possession for a long time, so the region wasn't the most wealthy. The area was incredibly diverse, with various Islamic, Christian, and Jewish groups living next to each other. A lot of local politics was clan based, with heads of families handling a lot of dispute resolution and internal welfare. The various peoples generally practiced a form of Zeus's Law from the Odyssey, extremely hospitable to outsiders.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

You have to be specific (rule 2). This is a very general question.