this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
168 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

17615 readers
42 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ok, I actually LOLed IRL seeing this as the first comment. This is such an awesome gif!

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I would like to dedicate this post to the academy...

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 48 points 3 days ago
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

“Expedited interviews” lmao

I hope anybody considering going back would demand full remote and quadruple their old salary.

They’re just going to do it again once a new AI model comes out they’re happy with.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They should contract as consultants.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

"Consulting" aka "tack another zero on my old rate". Hell yeah.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

They’re just going to do it again once a new AI model comes out they’re happy with.

... and an ironclad contract that'll heavily penalise them for doing that.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

they will get rid of them once they "fixed it whatever AI broke or dint produce" dont even need to wait til a new model.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago

It took a loooooong time for sears to go under because of greed, this is going to take much longer for amazon.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 days ago

Perhaps they should get bent.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

where did that 200bn they spent go, cant be those sweet ai chips or datacenters.