this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
185 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

51627 readers
397 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the same directors of OpenAI closing their models, Privacy.com now requires ID checks.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

IDK if it was Persona, but when I tried to sign up last year, they demanded I send a copy o fmy photo ID to a 3rd party identity broker. I refused, and did not sign up. Given the recent huge breaches of photo ID databases, I feel kinda vindicated about that.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I started to sign up a couple years ago, maybe, and they wanted a massive amount of personal info. It never made sense to me. If I was willing to give all that out to some random company online, I wouldn't need a privacy service.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suppose they are going to require some KYC info. They have legal reqs they have to meet. So, I get that they must know my real identity. Still, they could do it without a photo ID given to a 3rd party identiy broker. There are other ways, which do not depend on an ID copy which every identity thief in the world wants.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why are they subject to KYC requirements? Are they a finance company?

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Good question, maybe I spoke too quick. I think they might be since they extend credit and deal with connections to the banking system. But I'm NAL. At least they are going to require a real world identity when giving out credit card numbers, which is also true of traditional card companies.

Mostly I'm OK with them knowing my IRL identity, and proving that to them. But I'm not OK with sending a digital photo of my DL to some 3rd party identity broker who tends to leak those a lot.

[–] tensor_nightly69@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FUCK indeed. Now I guess I need to find an alternative. Fuck all this id verification bullshit.

[–] Scaramanga@thelemmy.club -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Get a second ID for all this nonsense, and sleep easy at night.

[–] ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A second ID from where may I ask?

[–] Scaramanga@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

Signal Mr_Blue.72 100% genuine and reliable.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

New thing called AI. People's names and adresses are public record in many places if they own their home. Have at it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

using stolen/leaked ids as your own is a felony on many (most? all?) places. don't know what ai has to do with it.

but just fyi so you don't get arrested or anything.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anyone have recommended alternatives?

[–] latetolemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. Surrender your internet plan and touch grass.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 1 month ago

It’s not a bad plan at all and I touch more grass with every new thing that enshittifies.

[–] rustbuckett@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

People have been discussing it for months. I haven't noticed it until now. Apparently you haven't either... So I think you won't be affected until you do something major.

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I say close your account before they make you hand your Id over.

[–] rustbuckett@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. It may finally be time to completely close my gmail/google account.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I logged in last night and didn't see anything about verification. Still, I'm going to start looking for alternatives.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

same, I wasn't personally affected... Yet

But I'm also not creating any more cards with them and I'm jumping ship if I see decent alternative.

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Lol that thumbnail summs up pretty well what I was thinking when I read the headline

[–] dmtalon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My CC is EOL it's extension to access/create virtual CC's and I use that multiple times a week so I've been looking around and knew about privacy.com

And that's quite the timing regarding them. I can still create and use virtual cards but it's going to be a lot bigger pita which is why I was looking around.

Hope someone knows a good alternative!

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe Revolut works still.

[–] dmtalon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One thing I found is revolut is different than what I want I don't want a new bank or bank like app just virtual ccs. And if course you have this from yesterday

https://www.theregister.com/cyber-crime/2026/09/25/another-week-another-data-breach-for-revolut-customers/5299092

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

The sheet did kyc for me. I wonder if that will prevent them asking for an id

[–] rando@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I'm using privacy.com haven't been asked any ID yet but then again bank account is attached to it so I assume it verifies through bank. What am I missing, what should I change? Or maybe how should I understand this change?

Link to article?