this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43629 readers
303 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, timely and thoughful as ever:

Claims of incipient, dangerous superintelligence are not based in good scientific or engineering practice. Rather, they are narratives based in ideologies of transhumanism, eugenics, and wishful thinking about imagined future digital humans.

[…]

the illusion of speed and urgency promulgated by the tech companies is also a ploy to misdirect both policymakers and the public. Unfortunately, it sometimes works, such as with Senator Bernie Sanders’s well-meaning but ultimately misguided proposed legislation to prevent the development of “artificial superintelligence.”

Describing them as “superintelligence” or “rogue models” ascribes agency to products rather than to the companies building them. This framing markets these companies’ products as “superhuman” and, at the same time, helps the companies evade accountability for their actions.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pageflight@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

What a breath of sanity.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its not that superintelligence exists but that humans will sede their intelligence to what appears to be more intelligent. Thus we will just let the machines do their thing without thinking about the consequences.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Alternatively, tech companies have run out of things to monopolize besides human intelligence and creativity themselves, and can apparently offer a pale imitation.

When Sam Altman says he needs his product to think on his behalf when it comes to raising a child, is he lying or is he really that seduced by ChatGPT? I don't think it really matters.

[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

By

Timnit Gebru

Emily M. Bender

Well, that's all I needed to know! Thanks for the share.

[–] halm@leminal.space 5 points 1 week ago

They're both on the fediverse at https://dair-community.social/ 🙂

Give 'em a follow if you're so inclined.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

In a very good way!