this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
-2 points (43.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50320 readers
693 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thatoneguy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not an expert but I thought I would share my thoughts based on experience. When you look at the size of a file it's stored in actual metadata of the file so it can be accessed quickly however since a folder is a collection of files it can't easily keep that info. Once you ask the is what the size it is has to go and add up the values of each file contained in it. This can take a bit of time especially with larger folders so if windows constantly calculated the size of every folder it would just waste resources and make everything painfully slow. Again not an expert this is just how I think it happens.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'd say for the same reason that big enough folders can take several minutes to hours to actually give you their sizes.

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You're correct. An expert might have used some fancy words like "recursion" or "computational complexity", but would have expressed essentially the same idea.

OP, to solve your problem, use a program like TreeSize.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] safesyrup@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used wiztree, orders of magnitude faster

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Neat! I'll have to try that next time i need to work on a windows machine.

Qdirstat is what i use on linux which is the OG afaik. Its actually what windirstat was porting over when it was initially made. Its insanely fast for me

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because showing the folder size requires scanning all the files in it, as well as all the files in all it's subfolders. For some folders that could mean tens of thousands of files. Which would take quite some time.

There are ways to speed that up. But you'd be scanning all the files, all the time to keep a database updated.

Basically, it's a lot of overhead

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

This. macOS does do folder sizes. It rarely shows because it takes forever. Maybe if the drive was formatted APFS it would be faster? Not sure though. My drives are NTFS and exFAT.