this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
107 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

5089 readers
225 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cryowatt@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 minutes ago

Why do they need cameras to begin with? Wtf are these even for? They failed miserably last time around, why are the tech companies trying again?

[–] banause@feddit.org 4 points 2 hours ago

Smartglasses shouldn't my face. At all.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 hours ago

No. They should be banned completely.

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Eh, ok. And how will this work exactly?

The glasses will record everyone, send their faces to a third party or government server...

(to check 'blur or not, of course, of course, nothing else. And then we'll delete them again - pinky promise!)

Ah yes. For privacy.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My degoogled phone's open source camera app (with no internet access) detects faces instantly and locally

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, detecting whether something is a face wouldn't be a problem. You can just just use the FaceDetect api on android.

Thought then after you detect a face, you still have to decide - is this a face to blur? If you have some sort of database for that, you'll still have to some face identifier there to check if it's whitelisted or not

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

No. Blur every face.

The only issue I see is that people who wear tech to avoid facial recognition will be the only heads that aren't blurred.

[–] codeinabox@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This could be done on the device, for example the Android app ObscuraCam has automatic face detection.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago

It can, but that would ruin Facebook's bottom line

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 19 hours ago

We all need to normalize walking out of meetings and other social engagements when we see these in public. Make them feel weird for wearing it. If in a professional setting: "I'm sorry I'm not comfortable proceeding with this conversation / meeting while being recorded"... "They arnt recording"...."There is no way for me to fully verify that. I would be happy to continue if they are put away, otherwise we will need to postpone."

And then stick to your boundaries.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The pervert glasses will first run object detection, detect your face and then blur it.

Soooooo...

Alternative suggestion: they should be banned.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

Nah nah; crikey. We’ll just make ‘em promise to do the blurring first! Then, nobody gets their feelings hurt, mate.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oooor.. hear me out. Ban smart glasses, excepting with very limited uses for helping disabled folks

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Has there ever been any intelligent thought coming from Australian governments/politicians/authorities that has anything to do with technology? Just wondering because isn't this the same country where a leading politician once said that the laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only laws that apply in Australia are those of Australia...

Hint: Something like this can only be enforced if you ban smart glasses on which the user can install any software they like (e.g. free and open source software). And if you go down that route, what is stopping governments from doing the same thing to other computers too?

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 6 points 17 hours ago

Very, very few Aussie politicians have ever understood technology to a degree necessary to legislate about it. We’ve had a handful of independent Members and Senators who show real interest and understanding (like former AFL legend David Pocock) but they’re definitely an extremely small minority. We produce some amazing technologies, especially medical tech and quantum computing where we’re world-leading, but our best and brightest very rarely ever end up in government. As an Aussie tech and privacy enthusiast it can be supremely frustrating.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 4 points 23 hours ago

You think it can not recognize your walk or voice or what?

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 4 points 23 hours ago

Maybe we could just blur the vision of all the users

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 22 hours ago

Someone will make a hack to unblur faces and it'll be back to square 1.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 0 points 22 hours ago

Ah yes, make them useless for filming police abuse, great idea.