this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
72 points (95.0% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1846 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prairie_Madness@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Of course. He's a spineless sack of shit. Perfect for the GOP

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

I fucking hate what he did, but his actions are such a fascinating story of the impacts of brain damage and how much it aligns with certain ideology.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because angering the left is their favorite pastime. It's just as good as making their own lives better because of their zero-sum thinking.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Came here to say this. Well said.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course it does, he's still losing his job at the end of his term.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not necessarily, depends on which party is in favor at the time (assuming democracy is still a thing and all that). Pennsylvania is a swing state, so if the political climate is right he could very well run as a Republican and win.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No matter which way Penn swings next cycle, Fetterman won't have the support to beat a challenger from either side. He's tainted to everyone, so anyone could beat him.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, according to the article that's not the case. He's essentially switched his Dem support for Republican support and vice versa, so it seems his total amount of support hasn't changed much.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But will that save him in the primary?

I think the people who like him are generally not primary voters. People joke he's a republican but modern republicans are so extreme he's still pretty far from the center of that party. I don't see him thriving against any primary challenger in either party.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They said the same crap about Specter. He'll try to prop himself up, but at the end of the day, he'll lose the primary.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Well he's got brain damage so he's in good company with his new buds.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

"Stupid petulant asshole's popularity soars with other stupid petulant assholes. More at 11"

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 8 points 1 day ago

They hated him because he didn't wear a suit, now they love him because it turns out he's a pirce of shit.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago

The golem of Pennsylvania