this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
46 points (100.0% liked)

Atheist Memes

7310 readers
102 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 55 minutes ago (2 children)

The classic response:

"He is testing us"

And here I thought that God was all-knowing, so he should know how we would react before having to test us

[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 3 points 41 minutes ago

But some animals living far from humans, il forest and oceans, some we never pay attention to... They too, suffer some sicknesses and the too early lost of their kids. Some get eaten slowly from the inside by parasites, some who did no sin die in some long and painfull cancer…

How does an almighty and perfectly good god does not just allow it, but decided to create this like that, checked it, and found that it is good?

Would the world be worse if innocent animal kids (whose are given no free will) could die with less pain?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 46 minutes ago

Furthermore, he would already know whether or not you'd pass the test before you were even created. So why create you if he already knows you'll fail those tests?

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 1 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

God is an almighty asshole.

Proof number one:

There is evil on this world and life is unfair.

God could do sth. about it, but doesn't.

God is all knowing, so you can't just say he didn't know.

Proof number two:

Religious people are more often intolerant than atheists.

Proof number three:

We are made in God's image. And I see a lot of assholes around here.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 6 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

There's been a LOT of attempts to explain this throughout history, none of them are really airtight. Until one day I finally cracked it. Like seriously, I think I have a solution without a contradiction:

What if... God is just not very clever? He's doing his best, ok?

If he's really all powerful - I hear you object - couldn't he simply increase his intelligence? Yes. Yes he could. If he thought of it =(

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

"if you're a dumbass and you know it, clap your hands"

suddenly, rolling thunder

[–] amio@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

All-powerful, all-seeing and loving. 1 and 2 can't be true for someone who dropped the ball this bad

[–] Klear@piefed.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 1 points 34 minutes ago

This perfectly lines up with a series called Miracle Workers and in it Steve Buscemi is God and he's an absolute fuck up.

[–] TopsickPilgrim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It may be that they beleive that those who suffer are actually morally corrupt in some way, even themselves, which is part of why the wealthy become so admired.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If god actually existed, he would be both. So there is no wrong button.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

For the same reason you do.

Okay, say you have an ant farm or something like that. You have the power to pour bleach in your ant farm and kill all of them at once. Or you could drop food in there. They are aware of you and think of you like a god, so they worship you. But when they do shitty things to each other, they wonder why you didn't step in and intervene. You qualify as all-powerful and all-knowing (imagine you can see all the pathways from both sides), so, why don't you step in? The fact is, you don't really care. You might care that you have an ant farm. You care about the bigger picture. But the small things? Like who gets to be queen and the shitty things they do to each other? It's not really your concern.

If a god were a real thing, it would be some kind of life force that is quite beyond our understanding, and thus, it wouldn't really care about our internal struggles, if it had a motivation to see us as a species succeed (in what? just surviving? Basically).

It's easy to say gods don't exist, but, we really don't know what's out there in the stars. Imagine something could live in space without oxygen, and imagine it can't be seen by our instruments. That might be like a god. We don't really know.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

It’s easy to say gods don’t exist

It's more accurate to say that the existence of any god is inversely proportional to the relevance of that god.

Sure, there could be a hidden god out there in the stars that never interacts with us at all. That would be really difficult to disprove. But it's also pointless to disprove, because in our practical everyday lives, it makes no difference whether such a god exists or not. If you want to talk about a god that actually does things and actually has some impact on our real lives, well then -- now that's testable and disprovable.

God either doesn't exist or doesn't matter. And the difference between those two isn't terribly important.

[–] amio@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

You're not omniscient or omnipotent in the ant farm - you have a very limited view and very limited powers. "Doesn't care" does not mesh with god being all-loving, which is the 3rd part of the standard bs.

It’s easy to say gods don’t exist, but, we really don’t know what’s out there in the stars.

It's easy to say "until someone proves anything at all, which seems like a fair thing to request, you don't need to act as if you believe it", and also true. While it can't be conclusively disproven that maybe some god is lurking around out there, earthly religion makes testable, falsifiable claims all the time. Which are then tested, and falsified

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 hour ago (6 children)

I’ve never understood the hype surrounding this pseudo-dilemma in atheist circles. The answer is actually quite simple: being all-powerful doesn’t mean being capable of doing impossible things. If your definition of omnipotence includes the ability to do the impossible, then, as a Christian, I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent, but that is merely a matter of wordplay.

There are many valid criticisms of religion and even of theism, but this one has never really made sense to me.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

being all-powerful doesn’t mean being capable of doing impossible things

So ... can your god, for example...

  • Turn water into wine?

  • Die and then come back to life 3 days later?

  • Walk on water?

  • Create the entire universe from nothing?

What exactly is and is not 'impossible' for your god? What kind of god can do those things, but can't, say ... prevent Epstein and his rich friends from raping kids for decades? Why is one possible and the other impossible?

[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Well, the christian's claim is that god created the world as it is, in 6 days, and that each day he checked what he did and that he saw it was good. And so he not only created pain for innocent baby animals, but he also validated it as good. May is it onavoidable, but we are still able to regret it. Is our moral highes than god's moral? Or are we wrong and should we train ourself to feel joy at the idea of a new born baby mouse tortured by a cat who may (or not) eat it after his play (when the baby mouse died)?

[–] amio@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

Of course. All the answers are simple, in such a way that it's easy to show how they're all really bad arguments. Such as "Well it's simple really, one of the three main characteristics of god, that literally everyone knows, just isn't true when inconvenient to my position."

Hence the "hype" - it's pretty useful to have an argument that, no matter what people try to argue, immediately has to result in something stupidly obviously illogical, something that contradicts one or more lore points, some cop out bs, bad faith argumentation, or everything all at once.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 minutes ago

If your god is not all powerful, then your religion lied to you about what your god even is.

According to your lore, his will is our reality - he isn't bound by the laws of our universe, he made them. So he didn't just allow evil and suffering to exist, he actively put it here. Why worship a being so full of hate?

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 1 points 27 minutes ago

The Bible says god is allmighty.

In the literal meaning. God has created us, the world and indirectly the universe.

If an allmighty God who has the power to create a world or a universe can't stop catastrophes from happening then what the fuck is wrong with them?

People in the old testament argued that they must have sinned, because God has sent them a catastrophe.

So according to the Bible God is creating catastrophes for a reason....

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

I'll break it down like this. Is all suffering necessary? Like do infants really need to get leukemia to achieve God's grand plan? Does he have the power to achieve his goal without giving infants leukemia?

It boils down to the fact that either he is not able to, and therefore not all powerful, or he is and chooses to give babies cancer anyway, and therefore not all good.