this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
150 points (98.7% liked)

Android

22040 readers
204 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I was thinking last night about how i’d like to have a GrapheneOS e-ink phone.

It would be cool to have a device that’s private and has my favorite type of screen.

[–] Mucki@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Had the same thought for the first time reading this post. It would be so damn cool! I am currently testing an e-ink device and it is much closer to what I would want. Will look into rooting it soon. But it is certainly not a daily driver, just fiddling around and enjoying a screen that becomes more viewable, the more sun you let shine on it. On the other hand the OLED screens deliver such a great dark black that they are more suitable for night readers.

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What are you playing with? I’m rocking a Viwoods myself and it’s pretty great, I wish I could get the backlight to be warmer light.

I’m back and forth still on OLED, it’s so vibrant and beautiful it’s almost too powerful if that makes sense. That said, the new minimal phone and the light phone 3 seem to be embracing it with some success

[–] Mucki@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Currently a Boox. They have a temperature slider. I am actually testing different e-ink devices from different manufacturers. OLED is shit in the bright sunlight, compared to e-ink. It's my favorite thing to do with e-ink: reading outside. Really has the kind of paper characteristics to it.

[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We need CHEAPER GrapheneOS phones, not more expensive!

[–] rangber@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Get used pixel. They are cheap

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And I want WAY more people using Graphene. I want a 'herd immunity' effect where we can starve the virus that is unlawful state surveillance. That won't happen if truly affordable devices aren't available.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Unless maps and pay work people wont switch to it.

[–] Sprossnix@slrpnk.net 3 points 16 hours ago

Me too, but sure when it's profitable for them they coud very well release more affordable devices too.

[–] jaygray91@piefed.zip 6 points 1 day ago

If I'm reading the thread correctly, it seems to be Qualcomm that's gating the security features GOS requires in high end SoCs.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I guess Im the only one who would prefer cheaper phones. Midrange with a jack is far more appealing to me than some flagship.

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

I think, they reason they did this is because the only chip rn beside tensor that is compliant with what standards graphene has is 8 elite gen 5.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Totally with you. For me a perfect phone consists of:

  • Big Ass Battery (BAB) (Also make it changeable, so i can bring one with me and "charge" it in a second)
  • Headphone Jack
  • USB-C (Obviously)
  • 60Hz Display (Once you look at 120Hz you can never go back so I dont want to, also it drains battery)
  • microSD-Card (You can change, maybe with support to up to 1 TB just for funsies)
  • 4G (It is more than enough. 5G also drains your battery)
  • One Camera (Honestly still not over how goofy those 2+ camera sets look, they are even on cheaper phones nowadays)
  • Latest Security Patches
  • Normal sized and light (Have to be able to reach the top with one hand.)

I just want phones to last longer than a day again :(

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Once you look at 120Hz you can never go back so I dont want to

Too late for me. My current phone has 165 Hz (Motorola Edge 40 Pro) and I don't want to go back to a mere 120, let alone 60.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

My dream phone would be similar, but with 5G and the usual larger size (imo the tradeoff is worth it in my case).

It would also have a silicon carbon battery to have the huge capacity, and most importantly a CPU limiter in the OS to stop it from eating up power by constantly turboing.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I disagree with this one

4G (It is more than enough. 5G also drains your battery)

You'll need to upgrade again if/when the network support changes. I'd prefer that it was future proofed

[–] vogi@piefed.social 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I do not worry about that: I live in Germany. I'll be long dead before anything changes around here πŸ‘

[–] tehsYs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You will never get a phone likes this.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

...Unless you go for Fairphone 6 Plus.

[–] tehsYs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 16 hours ago

There are multiple points which the FP6+ does not meet.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Way to ruin somebodies hopes and dreams. :(((

Have the Pixel 3A which gets pretty close. Does not have swappable Storage and only the latest security patches as there are still, what feels like, two random people backporting security patches as its not officially supported by LineageOS. Not sure how long that will last.

[–] tehsYs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 21 hours ago

Sorry I meant as a new phone

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, especially for modern phones. What good does the more powerful hardware do me? I don't do anything on my phone where I need more processing power. A higher quality screen is nice, but all modern phones have screens that are of a high enough resolution to not matter. Just give it a larger battery and I'm good.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That seems concerning, considering I haven't seen Motorola make a "flagship" phone in years, and the newest Pixel historically hasn't exactly been a "cheap" phone (like Motorola normally makes). It seems like they are just prepping the public for it to be scary expensive. :/

[–] Wildone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Exactly. They need to make it cheaper so it becomes popular first, not prepare us for shocking price.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

That seems concerning, considering I haven't seen Motorola make a "flagship" phone in years

don't they have their signature series,

I am using a Moto Razr 50u flip, and the have Fold phones as well.

let down by the years of support. I am. surprised Google. doesn't lean on them. about no Graphene phones though

[–] Wildone@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So they are preparing us to pay higher prices than one of the most popular phone companies flagship phones? Sounds like it's already bound to fail. Not many people are willing to pay more while they can get pixel for less and flash grapheneos.

[–] Mucki@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Early adopter here. I am here to tell you that your assumption is wrong. I will happily pay a higher price than for a same-spec pixel and even help with the development in my free time. Most important precondition is that it holds everything up to the highest possible standards. Good things cost, that's how the system works. And good things are scarce ...

[–] Wildone@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

First versions are almost never good. And even if it was by some miracle, the only high standard is security and privacy here. In all other ways it will be worse than Samsung, Google, Apple, and I am not even going to name chinese phones. So I hope I am wrong, but if I am not, I hope they survive long enough to produce something not only die hard fans will buy.

[–] Mucki@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It's not a first for Motorola, neither for Graphene devs. We'll see how they'll perform! There is always the last resort of just dumping the "smart"phone alltogether.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 5 points 1 day ago

I'll do it years from now after my Pixel 8 isn't viable anymore, I already own it anyways.

[–] PangurBan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Honestly, yeah. I'm down. As long as it's good quality.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

bad news is lenovo overprices phones. good news is most of them get cheap fast cause noone buys them.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only bad news - none of them are sold in US - otherwise I would buy it

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I am on a Lenovo phone right now, purchased in the US of A. Motorola is owned by Lenovo, so I'm just saying I have a Motorola

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Im OOTL on this one. Am I reading this right; GraphineOS is pushing out their own devices, pre-loaded with GraphineOS? Or just 'GraphineOS ready' devices, with some generic Android preinstalled?

[–] SatansDaughter@quokk.au 26 points 1 day ago

They've partnered with Motorola to make phones officially compatible with GrapheneOS, we apparently don't know yet if the phones will come preinstalled with it tho

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The upcoming Moto devices won’t ship with GrapheneOS, but they will be fully supported by the project with help from Moto itself.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/08/motorolas-grapheneos-phones-will-launch-in-2027-priced-higher-than-pixels/

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

That's going to last all of 8 months, I bet.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, they're partnering with Motorola I believe to bring devices that come with Graphene out of the box

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah? Thats what out of the box means. Motorola will ship the phone with GraoheneOS, so they will also support it

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Motorola will not ship the phone with grapheneOS. In the linked article:

The upcoming Moto devices won’t ship with GrapheneOS

Im not going to be able to get friends and family to make the switch then. My next device will probably be another refurbished Pixel.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Take the AI out of a pixel and what have we got? A secure mid range phone.

What is this going to do better than a flagship?

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but pixels are actively fucking with sources for pixels now.
You also can't trust Google not backdooring hardware.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Oh for sure, no debate I hate google I just mean saying this isnt a great look. Pixels are not a great phone. They are only flagship because they have been said to be one.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί