this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
312 points (94.6% liked)

Today I Learned

31100 readers
133 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In other news, the definition of ultraprocessed remains all over the fucking place with little consistency and rooting in logic. It's a term that grew out of marketing and ended up being defined by non-scientists/non-doctors.

raw oats in a bag: unprocessed
rolled oats: processed
rolled oats spun in a blender, instant oatmeal: ultra processed

Cookies made from unprocessed ingredients: minimally processed put them in a bag and sell them on a shelf: ultra-processed

Same nutritional value. Doesn't require additives.

Raw Milk: unprocessed Fresh, pasteurized milk : "minimally processed"

Brown Sugar: unprocessed white sugar: processed

white sugar and pasteurized milk mixed together: processed

Freeze that mixture? Ultra processed.

Again, same nutritional value.

Going from raw to pasteurized, has a substantial change in nutrition, yet, it's minimally processed.

We need, as a society, for scientists and doctors to agree on processing and food values, not on the general public's consensus. Certainly, some foods lose their value or are handled differently by the body. Some things, like nitrates, earn an easy bad-for-you label.

As is stands now, home made cookies are seen as more healthy, than if put them in a bag and sell them. We need to trigger on nutrition loss, and added ingredients, not if wheat was put through a blender or berries were frozen unless it has a meaningful loss on actual health.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago

Really interesting. I often thought "what is actually so bad about processed food?" because in the end everything we eat is just chemicals in different mixtures, so as a nerd it makes me skeptical of most food health advice. There doesn't seem to be an easily explainable understandable theory or scientific model model behind this.

I could have sworn I read "hyperpalatable food" in the blurb but I can't find it now. Maybe I dreamed it lol. But that would be a good objective issue with ultraprocessed food, triggering the brain's reward system and encouraging excessive eating. The ability to split ingredients into separate parts and then recombine them to be too palatable, and/or not balanced enough in the sense that e.g. fibers or proteins or vitamins that would naturally occur in raw food.

[–] ngcbassman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think is true that the idea of ultraprocessed food is not totally well defined, but I think there are some clues that help to at least identify the most important or more ultraprocessed ones. I think one tip is: industrial manufactured ingredients that can't be find in a regular home would potentially fall in the ultraprocessed category, so from your list:

rolled oats spun in a blender, instant oatmeal: is processed not ultraprocessed, unless the instant oatmeal it comes with ultraprocessed ingredients.

Cookies made from unprocessed ingredients, put them in a bag and sell them on a shelf: processed. The problem here is a lot of cookies that say that they use unprocessed ingredients is just not true, but if we are talking about home made cookies with basic unprocessed ingredients they would fall as just processed.

*Raw Milk: unprocessed Fresh, pasteurized milk : "minimally processed"

Brown Sugar: unprocessed white sugar: processed

white sugar and pasteurized milk mixed together: processed

Freeze that mixture? Ultra processed.* Not true, the fact of freezing doesn't make it ultraprocessed.

I think the corporations are also trying to make this distinction more confusing to make the idea of ultraprocessed food les guilty, because if everything it may be ultraprocessed then none it is.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Not true, the fact of freezing doesn’t make it ultraprocessed.

Therein lies the rub; in some lists, it doesn't, in other lists, it does. Your list is handled in what you wrote here, it's not the same as everyone's list.

The concept that it's hyper bad for them to throw cellulose in with grated parm is insane. It's just some fiber to keep it from turning into brick. Or that any food preservative is detrimental, we're already wasting 40% of our food.

The entire processed fad has gone so far from reality that it holds no concrete meaning to actual health

That dough stabilizer in that bread that makes it stay soft instead of the starch crystallizing and turning it to trash in 3 days, can you point to an actual fact of how it hurts you?

There are plenty of things on the UP list that are allowed the world over. The whole thing is performance art at this point.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I used to really piss hippies by telling them that anything food put in a food processor is processed food. This includes your homemade hummus & raw smoothies.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

And now the whole crunchy revolution is running with that, and a few dieticians in prestigious places, looking for views, are trying to build studies on it.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Americentrism at it again.

4/5, in the USA, the rest of the world have such a thing as Government Mandated Food Standards that ban this shite.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Why feed your children that shit.

[–] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The western world needs to reintroduce "home economics" back into the curriculum, nobody knows how to cook their own food anymore, managing a kitchen is half of it not just putting stuff onto a stove.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

My Boomer mom microwaves water to make tea... with the teabag in it.

It's a wonder I survived to become the handsome and successful person I am.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Let me see if I can translate this article to a less trendy version:

.About 80% of the packaged foods marketed for children between 6 and 30 months include ingredients only used when creating packaged food at scale. Half of these either contained more fat, sugar, and salt than the WHO recommends or did not abide by the WHO's advice to eliminate food coloring.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Those packaged toddler foods are expensive as well. I’d wager most parents are simply giving their toddlers portions of foods they eat themselves over buying this crap.

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's how we fed kids before corporations convinced us that kids need packets of pureed veggies in a single use plastics

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (22 children)

... in the United States

This is the internet. Please consider the audience to be worldwide.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The problem is not new. Just that the stuff is more expensive than just steaming vegetables and meats then put them through the blender, and in some developing countries, for poor families it's rice or wheat gruel.

[–] 2pNza@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think it is not only issue with the price but also with the time to prepare it. They do not survive using one salary to have more time to care of the children. Or lets say two salaries but 1/2 work time both.

Actually, there is no place on earth nowadays to have possibility like that, with one salary.

And people are wondering why young generations do not make children.

Gen Silent with one salary had 5 boomer children. I would love to have one salary and 2.5 children working half time

In. The. States.

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Four out of five foods sold for toddlers in the United States

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (5 children)

MATKETED to toddlers. Nobody is marketing apples and whole wheat.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

When will toddlers stop spending their money on this food?!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why he eating the pizza backwards

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Crust-first pizza eaters are sociopaths

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone tell RFK. It might be this instead of tylenol or circumcision that causes autism. /s

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, as we all know, infants should be fed a steady diet of raw milk and steak. All the better if the steak is from road kill. And eat it directly from a toilet seat. Germs can only hurt you if you're afraid of them!

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just read the exact same headline about prison food. Assuming that's because 80% of food in Magastan is ultra-processed, I guess we're gonna get the same headline for every possible institution now over the coming days.

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For prisons, my fellow Americans immorally view prisoners as less than human and not deserving of the basic elements of life -- poll a large swath of everyday Americans and I'm convinced 6+/10 will agree that prisons should serve intentionally unpleasant and non nutritious food as part of the punishment process. It's sad.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I think that's a global trend of humanity falling for populists, and morally back into the stone age (although I might be doing prehistoric humans injustice here). I really believe in the saying (paraphrasing because I don't recall the exact wording) that if you want to assess the degree of civilization in a society, you should look how it treats its prison inmates.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 15 points 3 days ago

Gotta get em young so they can later keep em dependant on the "health system".

load more comments
view more: next ›